• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达州对主要晚期早产儿和剖宫产的调查:出生证明和医院出院记录的准确性。

The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: the accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records.

机构信息

Department of Community and Family Health, College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., MDC 56, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul;17(5):869-78. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1065-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-012-1065-0
PMID:22714799
Abstract

(1) Assess the accuracy of public health data sources used to investigate primary late preterm cesarean delivery (PLPCD) and (2) compare differences in data accuracy by hospital PLPCD rate classification. This analysis uses data from the Florida Investigation of Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery (FILPCD), an investigation of singleton, PLPCD's that occurred from 2006 to 2007 in hospitals classified with either a low or high PLPCD rate (high rate 39.4-58.3 %, low rate 11.9-25.1 %). Three data sources were validated with maternal medical records: birth certificates, hospital discharge data, and combined birth certificate and hospital discharge data. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and kappa values were calculated. A summary measure of kappa values was compared by hospital PLPCD rate classification using the paired sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. Large variations in accuracy of data elements were found by hospital PLPCD rate classification, with low PLPCD rate hospitals demonstrating higher overall data accuracy. The summary measure of agreement was significantly higher for low PLPCD rate hospitals compared to high PLPCD rate hospitals (0.60 vs. 0.50, p < 0.01). Accurate estimates of CD and late preterm birth are vital for public health practitioners and policy makers who seek to address the growing concern over recent increases in CD and late preterm birth. Understanding the potential for systematic differences in reporting accuracy by hospital PLPCD rate is important to data quality improvement efforts.

摘要

(1) 评估用于调查主要晚期早产儿剖宫产 (PLPCD) 的公共卫生数据源的准确性,(2) 通过医院 PLPCD 率分类比较数据准确性的差异。本分析使用佛罗里达州晚期早产儿和剖宫产调查 (FILPCD) 的数据,该调查是对 2006 年至 2007 年在低或高 PLPCD 率(高率 39.4-58.3%,低率 11.9-25.1%)分类的医院发生的单胎 PLPCD 进行的调查。使用产妇病历对三种数据源进行了验证:出生证明、医院出院数据以及出生证明和医院出院数据的组合。计算了灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV) 和 Kappa 值。使用配对样本 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较了按医院 PLPCD 率分类的 Kappa 值汇总度量。发现医院 PLPCD 率分类的数据元素准确性存在较大差异,低 PLPCD 率医院的整体数据准确性较高。与高 PLPCD 率医院相比,低 PLPCD 率医院的一致性汇总指标显著更高(0.60 对 0.50,p < 0.01)。准确估计 CD 和晚期早产儿出生对于公共卫生从业者和政策制定者来说至关重要,他们试图解决最近 CD 和晚期早产儿出生增加的问题。了解医院 PLPCD 率对报告准确性的潜在系统差异对于数据质量改进工作很重要。

相似文献

1
The Florida Investigation of Primary Late Preterm and Cesarean Delivery: the accuracy of the birth certificate and hospital discharge records.佛罗里达州对主要晚期早产儿和剖宫产的调查:出生证明和医院出院记录的准确性。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul;17(5):869-78. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1065-0.
2
Assessing hospital differences in low-risk cesarean delivery metrics in Florida.评估佛罗里达州低风险剖宫产指标的医院差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Dec;229(6):684.e1-684.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.低风险妊娠女性的剖宫产:出生证明与医院出院数据的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jan;113(1):33-40. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318190bb33.
4
Accuracy of Birth Certificate Data for Classifying Preterm Birth.出生证明数据用于早产分类的准确性。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017 May;31(3):245-249. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12352. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
5
Are pregnancy outcomes associated with risk factor reporting in routinely collected perinatal data?常规收集的围产期数据中的危险因素报告与妊娠结局有关吗?
N S W Public Health Bull. 2013 Nov;24(2):65-9. doi: 10.1071/NB12116.
6
Accuracy of reporting maternal in-hospital diagnoses and intrapartum procedures in Washington State linked birth records.华盛顿州关联出生记录中孕产妇住院诊断和分娩期程序报告的准确性。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2005 Nov;19(6):460-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00682.x.
7
Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.出生证明与医院出院数据的准确性:认证护士助产士与医生的比较
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Nov;11(6):540-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0178-3. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
8
Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004-06.出生证明中辅助生殖技术信息的准确性:佛罗里达州和马萨诸塞州,2004-06 年。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2014 May;28(3):181-90. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12110. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
9
Examining the Prevalence Rates of Preexisting Maternal Medical Conditions and Pregnancy Complications by Source: Evidence to Inform Maternal and Child Research.按来源审视既往存在的孕产妇疾病和妊娠并发症的患病率:为母婴研究提供信息的证据
Matern Child Health J. 2017 Apr;21(4):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-2177-8.
10
Assessing the Quality of Medical and Health Data From the 2003 Birth Certificate Revision: Results From New York City.评估2003年出生证明修订版中的医疗卫生数据质量:纽约市的结果
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(8):1-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018.利用关联数据探究2011年至2018年马萨诸塞州剖宫产罗布森分类法相关的医学并发症。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2025 Feb 24;5(2):100470. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100470. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Race and Ethnicity Misclassification in Hospital Discharge Data and the Impact on Differences in Severe Maternal Morbidity Rates in Florida.医院出院数据中的种族和民族分类错误及其对佛罗里达州严重产妇发病率差异的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Apr 30;20(9):5689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20095689.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Births: preliminary data for 2009.出生情况:2009年初步数据
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010 Dec;59(3):1-19.
2
Expanded health data from the new birth certificate, 2006.2006年新出生证明中的扩展健康数据。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2009 Oct 28;58(5):1-24.
3
Persistence of morbidity and cost differences between late-preterm and term infants during the first year of life.晚期早产儿与足月儿在出生后第一年的发病率及成本差异持续存在。
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.
美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
4
Birth Certificate Validity and the Impact on Primary Cesarean Section Quality Measure in New York State.出生证明的有效性及其对纽约州初次剖宫产质量指标的影响。
J Community Health. 2019 Apr;44(2):222-229. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-0577-y.
5
Examining interpregnancy intervals and maternal and perinatal health outcomes using U.S. vital records: Important considerations for analysis and interpretation.利用美国生命统计记录研究妊娠间隔与孕产妇和围产期健康结局:分析与解读的重要考量因素
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;33(1):O60-O72. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12520. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
6
Barriers in Accurate and Complete Birth Registration in New York State.纽约州准确和完整出生登记的障碍。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Sep;19(9):1943-8. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1711-4.
7
Bridging the gaps between the histopathological and demographic risk factors of preterm birth in a unique Miami inner-city population.弥合迈阿密市中心独特人群中早产的组织病理学和人口统计学风险因素之间的差距。
Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2014 Aug;33(4):226-33. doi: 10.3109/15513815.2014.913749. Epub 2014 May 15.
8
A review of data quality assessment methods for public health information systems.公共卫生信息系统数据质量评估方法综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 May 14;11(5):5170-207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505170.
9
Maternal and hospital characteristics of non-medically indicated deliveries prior to 39 weeks.39周前非医学指征分娩的产妇及医院特征
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Oct;18(8):1893-904. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1433-z.
10
How accurate are medical record data in Afghanistan's maternal health facilities? An observational validity study.阿富汗医疗机构的病历数据有多准确?一项观察性有效性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 24;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002554. Print 2013.
Pediatrics. 2009 Feb;123(2):653-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1439.
4
A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery.关于医学选择性剖宫产相关问题的综述。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;36(6):605-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00196.x.
5
Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates.剖宫产率上升对健康的影响。
Epidemiology. 2007 Jul;18(4):485-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318068646a.
6
Maternal outcomes associated with planned primary cesarean births compared with planned vaginal births.与计划剖宫产相比,计划阴道分娩的产妇结局。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Mar;109(3):669-77. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000255668.20639.40.
7
Elective cesarean section and induction and their impact on late preterm births.择期剖宫产与引产及其对晚期早产的影响。
Clin Perinatol. 2006 Dec;33(4):793-801; abstract viii. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2006.09.010.
8
Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences.选择性剖宫产:生殖后果
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):257-60. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.005.
9
Back to the future? A critical commentary on the 2003 U.S. National standard certificate of live birth.回到未来?对2003年美国国家标准出生证明的批判性评论。
Birth. 2006 Sep;33(3):238-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00109.x.
10
Accuracy of obstetric diagnoses and procedures in hospital discharge data.医院出院数据中产科诊断和程序的准确性。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.058.