Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Liver Transpl. 2012 Oct;18(10):1237-44. doi: 10.1002/lt.23493.
Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, the clinical benefits of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are not yet well established. We, therefore, investigated the outcomes of patients with HRS who underwent LDLT and patients with HRS who received transplants from deceased donors. This study focused on 71 patients with HRS out of a total of 726 consecutive adult Korean patients who underwent LT at a single Asian center. We compared 48 patients who underwent LDLT with 23 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Patients with HRS showed poorer survival than patients without HRS (P = 0.01). Poorer survival was associated with higher in-hospital mortality for patients with HRS (18.3% versus 5.2%, P < 0.001). In comparison with DDLT, LDLT was associated with younger donors and shorter ischemic times. The survival rate with LDLT was significantly higher than the survival rate with DDLT (P = 0.02). Among patients with high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (≥30) or type 1 HRS, the survival rates for the LDLT group were not inferior to those for the DDLT group. LDLT significantly improved recipient survival after adjustments for several risk factors (hazard ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.85, P = 0.03). Kidney function was significantly improved after LT, and there was no difference between LDLT and DDLT. No patients in the HRS cohort required maintenance renal replacement therapy. In conclusion, LDLT may be a beneficial option for patients with HRS.
肝移植(LT)是肝肾综合征(HRS)的治疗选择。然而,活体供肝移植(LDLT)的临床获益尚未得到充分证实。因此,我们研究了接受 LDLT 的 HRS 患者和接受已故供体肝移植(DDLT)的 HRS 患者的结局。本研究共纳入了 726 例连续接受 LT 的韩国成年患者中的 71 例 HRS 患者,这些患者均来自于一个亚洲中心。我们将 48 例接受 LDLT 的患者与 23 例接受 DDLT 的患者进行了比较。HRS 患者的生存率低于无 HRS 患者(P = 0.01)。HRS 患者的生存率较低与较高的院内死亡率相关(18.3%对 5.2%,P < 0.001)。与 DDLT 相比,LDLT 与更年轻的供体和更短的缺血时间相关。LDLT 的生存率明显高于 DDLT(P = 0.02)。在 MELD 评分≥30 或 1 型 HRS 的患者中,LDLT 组的生存率并不逊于 DDLT 组。LDLT 在调整了几个危险因素后显著改善了受者的生存率(风险比=0.20,95%置信区间=0.05-0.85,P = 0.03)。LT 后肾功能明显改善,LDLT 和 DDLT 之间无差异。HRS 组无患者需要维持性肾脏替代治疗。总之,LDLT 可能是 HRS 患者的有益选择。