Kruizinga Ingrid, Jansen Wilma, de Haan Carolien L, van der Ende Jan, Carter Alice S, Raat Hein
Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038762. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
The Brief Infant-Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA) is a relatively new and short (42-item) questionnaire that measures psychosocial problems in toddlers and consists of a Problem and a Competence scale. In this study the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the BITSEA were examined for the whole group and for gender and ethnicity subgroups.
Parents of 7140 two-year-old children were invited in the study, of which 3170 (44.4%) parents completed the BITSEA. For evaluation of the score distribution, the presence of floor/ceiling effects was determined. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was evaluated and in subsamples the test-retest, parent-childcare provider interrater reliability and concurrent validity with regard to the Child Behavioral Checklist (CBCL). Discriminative validity was evaluated by comparing scores of parents that worry and parents that do not worry about their child's development.
The BITSEA showed no floor or ceiling effects. Psychometric properties of the BITSEA Problem and Competence scale were respectively: Cronbach's alphas were 0.76 and 0.63. Test-retest correlations were 0.75 and 0.61. Interrater reliability correlations were 0.30 and 0.17. Concurrent validity was as hypothesised. The BITSEA was able to discriminate between parents that worry about their child and parents that do not worry. The psychometric properties of the BITSEA were comparable across gender and ethnic background.
The results in this large-scale study of a diverse sample support the reliability and validity of the BITSEA Problem scale. The BITSEA Competence scale needs further study. The performance of the BITSEA appears to be similar in subgroups by gender and ethnic background.
婴幼儿社会情绪简短评估量表(BITSEA)是一种相对较新的简短(42项)问卷,用于测量幼儿的心理社会问题,由问题量表和能力量表组成。在本研究中,对BITSEA荷兰语版本在整个样本以及性别和种族亚组中的信度和效度进行了检验。
邀请7140名两岁儿童的家长参与研究,其中3170名(44.4%)家长完成了BITSEA问卷。为评估分数分布,确定是否存在地板效应/天花板效应。评估内部一致性(Cronbach's α),并在子样本中评估重测信度、家长与儿童保育提供者之间的评分者间信度以及与儿童行为清单(CBCL)的同时效度。通过比较担心和不担心孩子发育的家长的得分来评估区分效度。
BITSEA未显示地板效应或天花板效应。BITSEA问题量表和能力量表的心理测量学特性分别为:Cronbach's α系数分别为0.76和0.63。重测相关性分别为0.75和0.61。评分者间信度相关性分别为0.30和0.17。同时效度符合假设。BITSEA能够区分担心孩子的家长和不担心孩子的家长。BITSEA的心理测量学特性在性别和种族背景方面具有可比性。
这项针对多样化样本的大规模研究结果支持了BITSEA问题量表的信度和效度。BITSEA能力量表需要进一步研究。BITSEA在性别和种族背景亚组中的表现似乎相似。