Suppr超能文献

全瓷嵌体和高嵌体在后牙修复中的临床性能。

Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth.

机构信息

Clinical Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jul-Aug;25(4):395-402.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this clinical retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical performance and longevity of glass-ceramic onlays and inlays in stress-bearing posterior teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Five hundred forty-seven posterior teeth in the maxillae and mandibles of 120 patients (46 males, 74 females) were restored with 213 onlays, 38 single-surface inlays, 141 two-surface inlays, and 155 three-surface inlays between 1987 and 2009 at Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria, by two experienced dentists. The restoration sample included 9 (1.6%) nonvital teeth and 40 (33%) patients diagnosed with bruxism. The study population was examined clinically during regularly scheduled maintenance appointments. The risk of failure was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses.

RESULTS

The mean observation periods for onlays and all inlays were 80 ± 34 months and 111 ± 63 months, respectively. Twenty-seven failures were recorded. The estimated survival rates for onlays and all inlays after 5, 10, and 12 years were 98.9% and 98.9%, 92.4% and 96.8%, and 92.4% and 89.6%, respectively. Nonvital teeth showed a significantly higher risk of failure (P < .001). There was no greater risk of failure associated with existing parafunction (bruxism) (P = .408). Restorations on premolars survived longer in the first 15 years than restorations on molars, but no statistical significance was found (P = .913).

CONCLUSION

Glass-ceramic onlays and inlays were demonstrated to be successful in posterior teeth; however, at this time, their efficacy is inferior to that of cast gold restorations.

摘要

目的

本临床回顾性研究旨在评估玻璃陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体在后牙负重区的临床性能和长期疗效。

材料和方法

1987 年至 2009 年,在奥地利因斯布鲁克医科大学,由两位经验丰富的牙医为 120 名患者(46 名男性,74 名女性)的上颌和下颌的 547 颗后牙制作了 213 个嵌体、38 个单面高嵌体、141 个双面高嵌体和 155 个三面高嵌体。修复体样本包括 9 颗(1.6%)非活力牙和 40 名(33%)磨牙症患者。通过定期的维护预约对研究人群进行临床检查。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析确定失败风险。

结果

嵌体和所有高嵌体的平均观察期分别为 80±34 个月和 111±63 个月。共记录了 27 例失败病例。嵌体和所有高嵌体在 5、10 和 12 年后的估计生存率分别为 98.9%和 98.9%、92.4%和 96.8%以及 92.4%和 89.6%。非活力牙的失败风险显著更高(P<0.001)。存在磨牙症等功能异常(P=0.408)与失败风险增加无关。在前 15 年,前磨牙的修复体存活率高于磨牙,但无统计学意义(P=0.913)。

结论

玻璃陶瓷嵌体和高嵌体在后牙中表现出良好的效果;然而,就目前而言,它们的疗效不如铸造金修复体。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验