Suppr超能文献

肝静脉插管和瞬时弹性成像在特发性门静脉高压症诊断中的作用。

Role of hepatic vein catheterisation and transient elastography in the diagnosis of idiopathic portal hypertension.

机构信息

Hepatic Hemodynamic Laboratory, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Oct;44(10):855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic portal hypertension is a rare cause of portal hypertension, frequently misdiagnosed as cryptogenic cirrhosis. This study evaluates specific findings at hepatic vein catheterisation or liver stiffness in idiopathic portal hypertension.

METHODS

39 cases of idiopathic portal hypertension patients were retrospectively reviewed. Hepatic vein catheterisation and liver stiffness measurements were compared to matched patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis, included as controls.

RESULTS

Hepatic vein-to-vein communications were found in 49% idiopathic portal hypertension patients precluding adequate hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in 12. In the remaining 27 patients, mean hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was 7.1 ± 3.1 mm Hg. Only 5 patients had HVPG≥10mmHg. HVPG was markedly lower than in cirrhosis (17 ± 3 mm Hg, p<0.001). Mean liver stiffness in idiopathic portal hypertension was 8.4 ± 3.3 kPa; significantly higher than in non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (6.4 ± 2.2 kPa, p=0.009), but lower than in cirrhosis (40.9 ± 20.5 kPa, p=0.005). Only 2 idiopathic portal hypertension patients had liver stiffness >13.6 kPa.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with idiopathic portal hypertension frequently have hepatic vein-to-vein communications and, despite unequivocal signs of portal hypertension, HVPG and liver stiffness values much lower than the cut-off for clinical significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis. These findings oblige to formally rule-out idiopathic portal hypertension in the presence of signs of portal hypertension.

摘要

背景

特发性门静脉高压是门静脉高压的一种罕见病因,常被误诊为隐源性肝硬化。本研究评估了特发性门静脉高压患者肝静脉插管或肝脏硬度检查的特定发现。

方法

回顾性分析 39 例特发性门静脉高压患者。将肝静脉插管和肝脏硬度测量结果与肝硬化和门静脉高压的匹配患者以及非肝硬化门静脉血栓形成患者(作为对照组)进行比较。

结果

49%的特发性门静脉高压患者存在肝静脉-肝静脉交通,12 例患者无法进行充分的肝静脉压力梯度测量。在其余 27 例患者中,平均肝静脉压力梯度(HVPG)为 7.1 ± 3.1mmHg。仅有 5 例患者的 HVPG≥10mmHg。HVPG 明显低于肝硬化患者(17 ± 3mmHg,p<0.001)。特发性门静脉高压患者的平均肝脏硬度为 8.4 ± 3.3kPa;明显高于非肝硬化门静脉血栓形成患者(6.4 ± 2.2kPa,p=0.009),但低于肝硬化患者(40.9 ± 20.5kPa,p=0.005)。仅有 2 例特发性门静脉高压患者的肝脏硬度>13.6kPa。

结论

特发性门静脉高压患者常存在肝静脉-肝静脉交通,尽管存在明确的门静脉高压征象,但 HVPG 和肝脏硬度值远低于肝硬化临床显著门静脉高压的截止值。这些发现要求在存在门静脉高压征象时正式排除特发性门静脉高压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验