Medical Affairs EMEA, Janssen-Cilag GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Aug;32(4):449-57. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31825cccad.
Metabolic effects are generally more pronounced with second-generation than first-generation antipsychotics. This study was designed to compare long-term metabolic effects and efficacy of paliperidone extended release (ER) with those of oral olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia. In this 6-month, multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group study, adults with schizophrenia were treated with paliperidone ER (6-9 mg/d; n = 239) or oral olanzapine (10-15 mg/d; n = 220). The primary outcome was mean change in the ratio of serum triglyceride level to high-density lipoprotein level (TG/HDL), a marker of insulin resistance. Other outcome measures included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores, measures of lipid and glucose metabolism, and body weight. Significant improvements in psychotic symptoms were observed with both treatments (P < 0.0001). The TG/HDL ratio was significantly higher at end point versus baseline with olanzapine compared with that of paliperidone ER. Mean end point change in TG/HDL ratio was 0.97 ± 2.72 [corrected] for olanzapine (P < 0.0001, reflecting worsening), with no significant change for paliperidone ER (-0.17 ± 2.51). Newly diagnosed impairment in TG and metabolic syndrome was more common with olanzapine (P < 0.05). Insulin resistance, as measured by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, worsened significantly with olanzapine (P = 0.0003), but not with paliperidone ER. Glucose sensitivity for insulin worsened significantly with olanzapine (P < 0.03), with no significant changes for paliperidone ER. End point increase in body weight was significantly higher with olanzapine than paliperidone ER (3.8 vs 1.2 kg; P = 0.0013). In summary, both paliperidone ER and olanzapine effectively treated schizophrenia; however, undesirable metabolic effects were significantly greater with olanzapine.
代谢效应通常在第二代抗精神病药中比第一代更为明显。本研究旨在比较帕利哌酮长效(ER)与奥氮平口服制剂在精神分裂症患者中的长期代谢效应和疗效。在这项为期 6 个月的、多中心、前瞻性、随机、对照、开放性、平行组研究中,将成人精神分裂症患者随机分为帕利哌酮 ER(6-9mg/d;n=239)或奥氮平口服制剂(10-15mg/d;n=220)组。主要结局是血清甘油三酯水平与高密度脂蛋白水平比值(TG/HDL)的平均变化,该比值是胰岛素抵抗的标志物。其他结局指标包括阳性与阴性综合征量表评分、脂质和葡萄糖代谢指标以及体重。两种治疗方法均显著改善了精神病症状(P<0.0001)。与帕利哌酮 ER 相比,奥氮平组在终点时的 TG/HDL 比值显著高于基线值。奥氮平组 TG/HDL 比值的终点平均变化为 0.97±2.72[校正](P<0.0001,提示恶化),而帕利哌酮 ER 组无显著变化(-0.17±2.51)。奥氮平组新诊断的 TG 受损和代谢综合征更为常见(P<0.05)。奥氮平组的胰岛素抵抗(通过稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗来衡量)显著恶化(P=0.0003),而帕利哌酮 ER 组无显著变化。奥氮平组的胰岛素敏感性(葡萄糖对胰岛素的敏感性)显著恶化(P<0.03),而帕利哌酮 ER 组无显著变化。奥氮平组的体重终点增加显著高于帕利哌酮 ER 组(3.8kg 比 1.2kg;P=0.0013)。总之,帕利哌酮 ER 和奥氮平均有效地治疗了精神分裂症;然而,奥氮平的不良代谢效应更为显著。