Sheffield NIHR Bone Biomedical Research Unit, Centre for Biomedical Research, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Sheffield NIHR Bone Biomedical Research Unit, Centre for Biomedical Research, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
J Clin Densitom. 2012 Oct-Dec;15(4):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
In vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), lateral scans are obtained with the patient positioned supine (C-arm densitometers) or lateral decubitus (fixed-arm densitometers). We aimed to determine the impact of positioning on image quality and fracture definition. We performed supine and decubitus lateral VFA in 50 postmenopausal women and used the algorithm-based qualitative method to identify vertebral fractures. We compared the 2 techniques for the identification of fractures (kappa analysis) and compared the numbers of unreadable vertebrae (indiscernible endplates) and vertebrae that were projected obliquely (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). The kappa score for agreement between the VFA techniques (to identify women with vertebral fractures) was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.99), and for agreement with fracture assessments made from radiographs, kappa was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94) for both supine and decubitus lateral VFA. There were more unreadable vertebrae with supine lateral (48 vertebrae in supine lateral compared with 14 in decubitus lateral; p=0.001), but oblique projection was less common (93 vertebrae compared with 145 in decubitus lateral; p=0.002). We conclude that there were significantly different projection effects with supine and decubitus lateral VFA, but these differences did not influence the identification of vertebral fractures in our study sample.
在椎体骨折评估(VFA)中,患者采用仰卧位(C 臂骨密度仪)或侧卧位(固定臂骨密度仪)获取侧位扫描。我们旨在确定体位对图像质量和骨折定义的影响。我们对 50 例绝经后妇女进行了仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA,并使用基于算法的定性方法来识别椎体骨折。我们比较了两种技术在识别骨折方面的表现(kappa 分析),并比较了无法读取的椎体数量(不可辨认的终板)和投影倾斜的椎体数量(Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验)。两种 VFA 技术(识别有椎体骨折的女性)之间的kappa 评分一致为 0.84(95%置信区间[CI]:0.68-0.99),与 X 线片评估的骨折结果一致,仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA 的 kappa 评分均为 0.76(95%CI:0.57-0.94)。仰卧位侧位扫描的不可读椎体数量更多(仰卧位侧位扫描 48 个椎体,而侧卧位扫描 14 个椎体;p=0.001),但倾斜投影较少(仰卧位 93 个椎体,而侧卧位 145 个椎体;p=0.002)。我们的结论是,仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA 存在明显的投影效果差异,但这些差异并未影响我们研究样本中椎体骨折的识别。