• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仰卧位与侧卧位患者在椎体骨折评估中的定位。

Supine vs decubitus lateral patient positioning in vertebral fracture assessment.

机构信息

Sheffield NIHR Bone Biomedical Research Unit, Centre for Biomedical Research, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Sheffield NIHR Bone Biomedical Research Unit, Centre for Biomedical Research, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Densitom. 2012 Oct-Dec;15(4):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.006
PMID:22727552
Abstract

In vertebral fracture assessment (VFA), lateral scans are obtained with the patient positioned supine (C-arm densitometers) or lateral decubitus (fixed-arm densitometers). We aimed to determine the impact of positioning on image quality and fracture definition. We performed supine and decubitus lateral VFA in 50 postmenopausal women and used the algorithm-based qualitative method to identify vertebral fractures. We compared the 2 techniques for the identification of fractures (kappa analysis) and compared the numbers of unreadable vertebrae (indiscernible endplates) and vertebrae that were projected obliquely (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). The kappa score for agreement between the VFA techniques (to identify women with vertebral fractures) was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.68-0.99), and for agreement with fracture assessments made from radiographs, kappa was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.57-0.94) for both supine and decubitus lateral VFA. There were more unreadable vertebrae with supine lateral (48 vertebrae in supine lateral compared with 14 in decubitus lateral; p=0.001), but oblique projection was less common (93 vertebrae compared with 145 in decubitus lateral; p=0.002). We conclude that there were significantly different projection effects with supine and decubitus lateral VFA, but these differences did not influence the identification of vertebral fractures in our study sample.

摘要

在椎体骨折评估(VFA)中,患者采用仰卧位(C 臂骨密度仪)或侧卧位(固定臂骨密度仪)获取侧位扫描。我们旨在确定体位对图像质量和骨折定义的影响。我们对 50 例绝经后妇女进行了仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA,并使用基于算法的定性方法来识别椎体骨折。我们比较了两种技术在识别骨折方面的表现(kappa 分析),并比较了无法读取的椎体数量(不可辨认的终板)和投影倾斜的椎体数量(Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验)。两种 VFA 技术(识别有椎体骨折的女性)之间的kappa 评分一致为 0.84(95%置信区间[CI]:0.68-0.99),与 X 线片评估的骨折结果一致,仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA 的 kappa 评分均为 0.76(95%CI:0.57-0.94)。仰卧位侧位扫描的不可读椎体数量更多(仰卧位侧位扫描 48 个椎体,而侧卧位扫描 14 个椎体;p=0.001),但倾斜投影较少(仰卧位 93 个椎体,而侧卧位 145 个椎体;p=0.002)。我们的结论是,仰卧位和侧卧位 VFA 存在明显的投影效果差异,但这些差异并未影响我们研究样本中椎体骨折的识别。

相似文献

1
Supine vs decubitus lateral patient positioning in vertebral fracture assessment.仰卧位与侧卧位患者在椎体骨折评估中的定位。
J Clin Densitom. 2012 Oct-Dec;15(4):454-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
2
Are bilateral decubitus views necessary in assessing for vertebral compression fractures using DXA vertebral fracture assessment?使用 DXA 椎体骨折评估评估椎体压缩性骨折时,双侧侧卧位片是否有必要?
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Aug;28(8):2377-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4040-1. Epub 2017 May 9.
3
Vertebral morphometry by DXA: a comparison of supine lateral and decubitus lateral densitometers.通过双能X线吸收法进行椎体形态测量:仰卧位侧位与卧位侧位骨密度仪的比较
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jul-Sep;9(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 11.
4
Vertebral fracture assessment: is lateral spine imaging in the supine or decubitus position better?椎体骨折评估:仰卧位或卧位的脊柱侧位成像哪种更好?
J Clin Densitom. 2012 Oct-Dec;15(4):389-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
5
Evaluation of vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter setting.多中心双能 X 线吸收法骨密度仪评估椎体骨折。
Osteoporos Int. 2009 Jul;20(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0806-9. Epub 2008 Dec 13.
6
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine--decubitus lateral versus anteroposterior projection in osteoporotic women: comparison to single energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm.脊柱双能X线吸收法——骨质疏松女性的卧位侧位与前后位投照:与前臂单能X线吸收法的比较
Bone. 1995 Feb;16(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)00037-z.
7
Addition of right lateral decubitus positioning improves vertebral visualization with VFA in selected patients.在部分患者中,增加右侧卧位可改善VFA对椎体的显影效果。
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jul-Sep;9(3):375-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.009.
8
Accuracy of densitometric vertebral fracture assessment when performed by DXA technicians--a cross-sectional, multiobserver study.由双能X线骨密度仪技术人员进行的骨密度椎体骨折评估的准确性——一项横断面多观察者研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1451-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3395-4. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
9
Diagnosis of vertebral fractures by vertebral fracture assessment.通过椎体骨折评估诊断椎体骨折
J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jan-Mar;9(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2005.11.002. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
10
Intrarater reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based measures of vertebral height in postmenopausal women.绝经后妇女基于双能 X 射线吸收法的椎体高度测量的内部可靠性。
J Clin Densitom. 2012 Oct-Dec;15(4):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Are bilateral decubitus views necessary in assessing for vertebral compression fractures using DXA vertebral fracture assessment?使用 DXA 椎体骨折评估评估椎体压缩性骨折时,双侧侧卧位片是否有必要?
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Aug;28(8):2377-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4040-1. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Efficacy of the dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.动态X线片诊断急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折的效能
Osteoporos Int. 2014 Feb;25(2):605-12. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2456-9. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Vertebral fracture assessment scans enhance targeting of investigations and treatment within a fracture risk assessment pathway.
椎体骨折评估扫描增强了骨折风险评估途径中调查和治疗的针对性。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Mar;24(3):1007-14. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2255-8. Epub 2013 Jan 10.