Demeler Janina, Kleinschmidt Nina, Küttler Ursula, Koopmann Regine, von Samson-Himmelstjerna Georg
Institute for Parasitology and Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Parasitol Int. 2012 Dec;61(4):614-8. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2012.06.003. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Resistance to anthelmintic drugs, particularly to the widely used benzimidazoles (BZs) and macrocyclic lactones (MLs) is an increasing problem in cattle industries worldwide. Reliable methods for the assessment of anthelmintic efficacy in the field are required in order to react before resistance becomes an obvious problem on individual properties. The ability of the Egg Hatch Assay (EHA) and the Larval Migration Inhibition Assay (LMIA) to detect anthelmintic resistance under field conditions was evaluated on cattle farms in Northern Germany. As published previously Faecal Egg Count Reduction Test (FECRT) was performed using oral albendazole (Valbazen®) or injectable ivermectin (Ivomec®). Herein the FECRT results described earlier were compared with data from EHAs or LMIAs, respectively, performed with eggs from fresh faeces or larvae from faecal cultures of the tested animals before and after treatment. The obtained EC(50) values allowed the assessment of efficacy of albendazole and ivermectin on farm level. The results of the FECRTs and the results of both in vitro assays were comparable. In comparison to the FECRT the in vitro assays are less time, labour and cost intensive and are able to assess the susceptibility status of a worm population without treatment. Therefore both are beneficial alternatives for the reliable detection of reduced efficacy of these two drug classes on farms.
对驱虫药产生耐药性,尤其是对广泛使用的苯并咪唑类(BZs)和大环内酯类(MLs)药物产生耐药性,在全球养牛业中是一个日益严重的问题。为了在耐药性在个体养殖场成为明显问题之前做出反应,需要可靠的现场评估驱虫效果的方法。在德国北部的养牛场对虫卵孵化试验(EHA)和幼虫移行抑制试验(LMIA)在现场条件下检测驱虫药耐药性的能力进行了评估。如之前所发表的,使用口服阿苯达唑(Valbazen®)或注射用伊维菌素(Ivomec®)进行粪便虫卵计数减少试验(FECRT)。在此,将先前描述的FECRT结果分别与用试验动物治疗前后新鲜粪便中的虫卵或粪便培养物中的幼虫进行的EHA或LMIA数据进行比较。所获得的半数有效浓度(EC50)值可用于评估阿苯达唑和伊维菌素在养殖场水平的疗效。FECRT结果与两种体外试验结果具有可比性。与FECRT相比,体外试验所需时间、人力和成本更少,并且能够在不进行治疗的情况下评估蠕虫群体的易感性状态。因此,这两种方法都是可靠检测这两类药物在养殖场疗效降低的有益替代方法。