Suppr超能文献

[健康专业知识:基于实践的方法]

[Health expertise: a practice-based approach].

作者信息

Daniel Christine, Françoise Bas-Théron, Durand Nicolas

机构信息

Inspection générale des affaires sociales. 39-43, quai André Citroën, 75739 Paris cedex 15.

出版信息

Sante Publique. 2012 Jan-Feb;24(1):41-7.

Abstract

As a result of various public health crises, expertise in health risk assessment in France has become the responsibility of autonomous state agencies. However, practice shows that despite the institutional separation of expertise and decision-making, the link between health risk assessment and the management of health risks by the public authorities remains ambiguous. Tensions have emerged between the state and the various agencies responsible for providing expertise, especially in cases where agencies make recommendations on procedures and protocols. In addition, while a significant number of regulations have been designed to protect the independence of experts in the health sector, their implementation raises a wide range of practical issues. The number and nature of the common interests of experts and professionals in the health sector complicate the identification and management of potential conflicts of interest. Collaboration between expert bodies only partly compensates for these difficulties. Finally, the involvement of 'stakeholders' concerned by the results of expertise have sparked a debate that remains unresolved. While some view it as a source of greater knowledge, others have seen the participation of 'lay' experts as a threat to the quality and impartiality of expertise. Regardless of the preferred approach, recent events show that stakeholders play a key role in health risk monitoring and assessment.

摘要

由于各种公共卫生危机,法国健康风险评估方面的专业知识已成为自主国家机构的职责。然而,实践表明,尽管专业知识与决策在制度上相互分离,但公共当局进行的健康风险评估与健康风险管理之间的联系仍不明确。国家与负责提供专业知识的各机构之间出现了紧张关系,特别是在各机构就程序和规程提出建议的情况下。此外,虽然制定了大量法规以保护卫生部门专家的独立性,但其实施引发了一系列实际问题。卫生部门专家和专业人员共同利益的数量和性质使潜在利益冲突的识别和管理变得复杂。专家机构之间的合作只能部分弥补这些困难。最后,受专业知识结果影响的“利益相关者”的参与引发了一场仍未解决的辩论。一些人认为这是获取更多知识的来源,而另一些人则认为“外行”专家的参与对专业知识的质量和公正性构成威胁。无论采用何种首选方法,最近的事件表明,利益相关者在健康风险监测和评估中发挥着关键作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验