Williams-Crowe S M, Aultman T V
Division of Public Health Systems, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30333.
Public Health Rep. 1994 May-Jun;109(3):361-7.
A new era of health care reform places increasing pressure on public health leaders and agencies to participate in the public policy arena. Public health professionals have long been comfortable in providing the scientific knowledge base required in policy development. What has been more recent in its evolution, however, is recognition that they must also play an active role in leading and shaping the debate over policy. A profile of effective State legislative policy "entrepreneurs" and their strategies has been developed to assist health agencies in developing such a leadership position. Based on the experiences of State legislative liaison officers, specific strategies for dealing with State legislatures have been identified and are organized into five key areas--agency organization, staff skills, communications, negotiation, and active ongoing involvement. A public health agency must be organized effectively to participate in the legislative policy process. Typically, effective agencies centralize responsibility for policy activities and promote broad and coordinated participation throughout the organization. Playing a key role in the agency's political interventions, the legislative liaison office should be staffed with persons possessing excellent interpersonal skills and a high degree of technical competence. Of central importance to effective legislative policy entrepreneurship is the ability to communicate the agency's position clearly. This includes setting forward a focused policy agenda, documenting policy issues in a meaningful manner, and reaching legislators with the proper information. Once a matter is on the legislative agenda, the agency must be prepared to negotiate and build broad support for the measure. Finally, public health agencies must be active policy players. To take advantage of new opportunities for action, the public health (policy) leader must monitor the political environment continually.By working to anticipate and formulate legislation,health officials can form meaningful relationships with legislators and the community, which are the cornerstones of political strength.
医疗保健改革的新时代给公共卫生领域的领导者和机构带来了越来越大的压力,要求他们参与公共政策领域的事务。长期以来,公共卫生专业人员一直乐于提供政策制定所需的科学知识基础。然而,在其发展过程中,最近人们认识到他们还必须在引领和塑造政策辩论方面发挥积极作用。已制定了一份关于有效的州立法政策“企业家”及其策略的简介,以协助卫生机构确立这样的领导地位。根据州立法联络官员的经验,已确定了与州立法机构打交道的具体策略,并将其归纳为五个关键领域——机构组织、员工技能、沟通、谈判以及持续积极参与。公共卫生机构必须进行有效组织,以便参与立法政策过程。通常,有效的机构会将政策活动的责任集中起来,并促进整个组织广泛而协调的参与。立法联络办公室在机构的政治干预中发挥关键作用,其工作人员应具备出色的人际交往能力和高度的技术能力。对于有效的立法政策创业而言,至关重要的是能够清晰地传达机构的立场。这包括提出重点突出的政策议程,以有意义的方式记录政策问题,并向立法者提供适当的信息。一旦某个事项列入立法议程,该机构必须准备好进行谈判,并为该措施争取广泛支持。最后,公共卫生机构必须积极参与政策制定。为了利用新的行动机会,公共卫生(政策)领导者必须持续监测政治环境。通过努力预测和制定立法,卫生官员可以与立法者和社区建立有意义的关系,而这些关系是政治力量的基石。