Department of Anesthesiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Aug;25(4):453-60. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32835562d8.
To illustrate the changes that are occurring in the rapidly growing field of pediatric sedation. In the USA and throughout the world, children receive sedation from a multitude of specialists with varying levels of training. The current pediatric sedation literature reflects a growing body of sedation literature by medical specialists other than anesthesiologists. This article will review the controversial use of propofol by nonanesthesiologists and the manner in which this varied group of providers along with government entities, regulatory agencies, and national organizations contribute to the continuing evolution of sedation practices.
The number of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures performed on children outside of the operating room continues to increase. The growing body of pediatric sedation literature suggests anesthesiologists are no longer at the forefront of pediatric sedation training, education, and research. Articles published by nonanesthesiologists describe pediatric sedation services, safety, and quality initiatives, drugs, and original sedation research. Medications that were considered under the realm of anesthesiologists are utilized by nonanesthesiologists to provide sedation to children. Regulating and government agencies, including the Joint Commission and the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services have recently issued statements on the oversight and practice of sedation.
The direction of pediatric sedation is no longer solely under the leadership of anesthesiologists. The use of anesthetic agents, including propofol, have been administered by nonanesthesiologists and reported as safe and effective agents. Nonanesthesiologists and governmental and regulatory agencies influence the delivery of sedation services. The future direction of pediatric sedation will ultimately depend upon the ability of anesthesiologists to collaborate with specialists, hospital administrators, credentialing committees, and oversight agencies in order to provide high-quality efficient sedation services to children.
阐述小儿镇静领域快速发展所带来的变化。在美国乃至全球范围内,接受镇静治疗的患儿由不同专业、不同培训水平的人员进行操作。当前小儿镇静领域文献反映了除麻醉医生以外的医学专业人员对镇静的研究兴趣日益浓厚。本文综述了非麻醉医生使用异丙酚的争议,以及该领域不同人员,包括政府机构、监管部门和专业组织,对镇静实践的持续发展所做出的贡献。
越来越多的诊断和治疗操作在手术室之外的环境下进行。小儿镇静文献的不断增加表明麻醉医生不再处于小儿镇静培训、教育和研究的前沿。非麻醉医生发表的文章描述了小儿镇静服务、安全性和质量计划、药物和原始镇静研究。曾被认为属于麻醉医生范畴的药物也被非麻醉医生用于为儿童镇静。监管和政府机构,包括联合委员会和医疗补助和医疗保险服务中心,最近就镇静的监督和实践发表了声明。
小儿镇静的方向不再完全由麻醉医生主导。非麻醉医生使用了包括异丙酚在内的麻醉药物,且其镇静效果和安全性得到了报告。非麻醉医生和政府及监管机构影响着镇静服务的提供。小儿镇静的未来方向最终将取决于麻醉医生与专家、医院管理人员、认证委员会和监督机构合作的能力,以向儿童提供高质量、高效率的镇静服务。