Suppr超能文献

儿科程序性镇静期间的生理监测实践:儿科镇静研究联盟的报告。

Physiologic monitoring practices during pediatric procedural sedation: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium.

作者信息

Langhan Melissa L, Mallory Michael, Hertzog James, Lowrie Lia, Cravero Joseph

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Nov;166(11):990-8. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe the frequency of different physiologic monitoring modalities and combinations of modalities used during pediatric procedural sedation; to describe how physiologic monitoring varies among different classes of patients, health care providers (ie, ranging from anesthesiologists to emergency medicine physicians to nurse practitioners), procedures, and sedative medications employed; and to determine the proportion of sedations meeting published guidelines for physiologic monitoring. DESIGN This was a prospective, observational study from September 1, 2007, through March 31, 2011.

SETTING

Data were collected in areas outside of the operating room, such as intensive care units, radiology, emergency departments, and clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-seven institutions comprise the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium that prospectively collects data on procedural sedation/anesthesia performed outside of the operating room in all children up to age 21 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Data including demographics, procedure performed, provider level, adverse events, medications, and physiologic monitors used are entered into a web-based system.

RESULTS

Data from 114 855 subjects were collected and analyzed. The frequency of use of each physiologic monitoring modality by health care provider type, medication used, and procedure performed varied significantly. The largest difference in frequency of monitoring use was seen between providers using electrocardiography (13%-95%); the smallest overall differences were seen in monitoring use based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications (1%-10%). Guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Emergency Physicians, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists for nonanesthesiologists were adhered to for 52% of subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

A large degree of variability exists in the use of physiologic monitoring modalities for pediatric procedural sedation. Differences in monitoring are evident between sedation providers, medications, procedures, and patient types.

摘要

目的

描述儿科程序镇静期间使用的不同生理监测方式及其组合的频率;描述生理监测在不同类别患者、医疗服务提供者(即从麻醉医生到急诊医学医生再到执业护士)、操作以及所使用的镇静药物之间如何变化;并确定符合已发布生理监测指南的镇静比例。设计:这是一项从2007年9月1日至2011年3月31日的前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

数据收集于手术室以外的区域,如重症监护病房、放射科、急诊科和诊所。

参与者

37个机构组成了儿科镇静研究联盟,该联盟前瞻性收集了所有21岁以下儿童在手术室以外进行的程序镇静/麻醉的数据。

主要观察指标

包括人口统计学、所进行的操作、提供者级别、不良事件、药物以及所使用的生理监测器等数据被录入一个基于网络的系统。

结果

收集并分析了114855名受试者的数据。不同医疗服务提供者类型、所使用药物以及所进行操作的每种生理监测方式的使用频率差异显著。监测使用频率的最大差异出现在使用心电图的提供者之间(13% - 95%);基于美国麻醉医师协会分类的监测使用总体差异最小(1% - 10%)。美国儿科学会、美国急诊医师学会和美国麻醉医师协会为非麻醉医生发布的指南在52%的受试者中得到了遵守。

结论

儿科程序镇静的生理监测方式使用存在很大差异。镇静提供者、药物、操作和患者类型之间的监测差异明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验