Barbi Egidio, Gerarduzzi Tania, Marchetti Federico, Neri Elena, Verucci Elena, Bruno Irene, Martelossi Stefano, Zanazzo Giulio, Sarti Armando, Ventura Alessandro
Clinica Pediatrica, Servizio di Gastroenterologia, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1097-103. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1097.
The need to perform procedural sedation for children has increased in recent years, and so has the experience of nonanesthesiologists in this field. The use of propofol increases the success of satisfactory deep sedation, but it can produce rapid and profound decreases in level of consciousness and cardiorespiratory function. Data are needed to assess the safety of this drug outside an anesthesiology setting.
To assess safety and efficacy of procedural sedation with propofol in a pediatric ward of a tertiary-care pediatric teaching hospital with trained personnel and monitoring facilities.
Patients admitted to the hospital who needed invasive procedures underwent procedural sedation by the pediatric sedation unit with intravenous propofol. A training protocol was developed to educate nurses and residents.
We performed 1059 procedures. Sedation was achieved in all procedures, and all but 1 were successfully performed. No patient required intubation. Transient desaturation resolving spontaneously occurred in 134 (12.7%) of 1059 patients. Major desaturation requiring a short course of ventilation occurred in 4 (0.8%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies, in 1 (0.3%) of 287 patients undergoing painful procedures, and in none of the 289 patients undergoing colonoscopies. Laryngospasm occurred in 10 (2.1%) of 483 patients undergoing upper endoscopies.
In this experience, the use of propofol with concurrent oxygen administration allowed sedations in children with no significant complications for colonoscopies and painful procedures. Complications in the group of upper endoscopies appear too high for recommending propofol in a sedation unit with residents in attendance. This protocol of procedural sedation by nonanesthesiologists allowed a significant increase in the number of procedures performed with sedation and saved anesthesiology resources.
近年来,对儿童实施程序性镇静的需求有所增加,非麻醉医生在该领域的经验也有所增加。丙泊酚的使用提高了达到满意深度镇静的成功率,但它会导致意识水平和心肺功能迅速而显著地下降。需要数据来评估这种药物在麻醉科以外环境中的安全性。
在一家拥有专业培训人员和监测设施的三级儿科教学医院的儿科病房中,评估丙泊酚用于程序性镇静的安全性和有效性。
入院需要进行侵入性操作的患者由儿科镇静小组使用静脉丙泊酚进行程序性镇静。制定了一项培训方案来培训护士和住院医师。
我们共进行了1059例操作。所有操作均成功实现了镇静,除1例以外全部成功完成。没有患者需要插管。1059例患者中有134例(12.7%)出现短暂性自行缓解的血氧饱和度下降。483例接受上消化道内镜检查的患者中有4例(0.8%)、287例接受疼痛性操作的患者中有1例(0.3%)出现需要短期通气的严重血氧饱和度下降,而289例接受结肠镜检查的患者中无一例出现。483例接受上消化道内镜检查的患者中有10例(2.1%)发生喉痉挛。
根据本经验,丙泊酚联合吸氧用于儿童镇静,在结肠镜检查和疼痛性操作中无明显并发症。在上消化道内镜检查组中并发症发生率似乎过高,因此不建议在有住院医师在场的镇静单元中使用丙泊酚。这种由非麻醉医生实施程序性镇静的方案显著增加了镇静操作的数量,并节省了麻醉科资源。