Suppr超能文献

外周神经阻滞用于上肢手术后对急诊部门的利用。

Emergency Department Utilization After Administration of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Upper Extremity Surgery.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2022 Jul;17(4):624-629. doi: 10.1177/1558944720963867. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks on emergency department (ED) utilization after hand and upper extremity surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed all outpatient upper extremity surgeries performed in a single Midwestern state between January 2009 and June 2019 using the Indiana Network for Patient Care. These encounters were used to develop a database of patient demographics, comorbidities, concurrent procedures, and postoperative ED visit utilization data. We performed univariate, bivariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 108 451 outpatient surgical patients, 9079 (8.4%) received blocks. Within 1 week of surgery, a greater proportion of patients who received peripheral nerve blocks (1.4%) presented to the ED than patients who did not (0.9%) ( < .001). The greatest risk was in the first 2 postoperative days (relative risk, 1.78; < .001). Pain was the principal reason for ED utilization in the block cohort (53.6%) compared with those who did not undergo a block (35.1%) ( < .001). When controlling for comorbidities and demographics, only peripheral nerve blocks (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.71; = 0.007) and preprocedural opioid use (adjusted OR, 1.43; = .020) conferred an independently increased risk of ED utilization within the first 2 postoperative days.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve blocks used for upper extremity surgery are associated with a higher risk of unplanned ED utilization, most likely related to rebound pain. Through proper patient education and pain management, we can minimize this unnecessary resource utilization.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定上肢周围神经阻滞对上肢和手手术后急诊(ED)利用的影响。

方法

我们使用印第安纳州患者护理网络,回顾了 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在中西部一个州进行的所有门诊上肢手术。这些手术被用来建立一个患者人口统计学、合并症、同期手术和术后 ED 就诊利用数据的数据库。我们进行了单变量、双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。

结果

在 108451 例门诊手术患者中,9079 例(8.4%)接受了阻滞。术后 1 周内,接受周围神经阻滞的患者(1.4%)到 ED 的比例高于未接受阻滞的患者(0.9%)( <.001)。最大风险发生在术后第 2 天(相对风险,1.78; <.001)。与未接受阻滞的患者(35.1%)相比,阻滞组(53.6%)到 ED 的主要原因是疼痛( <.001)。在控制合并症和人口统计学因素后,只有周围神经阻滞(调整优势比[OR],1.71; = 0.007)和术前使用阿片类药物(调整 OR,1.43; =.020)与术后第 2 天内 ED 就诊利用的独立风险增加相关。

结论

用于上肢手术的周围神经阻滞与计划外 ED 就诊利用的风险增加相关,这可能与反弹疼痛有关。通过适当的患者教育和疼痛管理,我们可以最大限度地减少这种不必要的资源利用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
[Peripheral nerve block and rebound pain: literature review].[周围神经阻滞与反弹痛:文献综述]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Nov-Dec;69(6):587-593. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
9
Rebound pain after regional anesthesia in the ambulatory patient.门诊患者区域麻醉后的反弹痛。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):679-684. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000651.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验