Stam J, van Crevel H
Department of Neurology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Neurol. 1990 Nov;237(7):427-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00314735.
The reliability of clinical examination of the tendon reflexes was examined by studying inter-observer agreement. Twenty patients were examined by three neurologists. The briskness of the tendon reflexes in arms and legs was scored on a nine-point scale. In 28% of the 160 examined reflexes the observations disagreed 2 scale units or more. Disagreement on the presence of asymmetry occurred in 45% of the 80 reflex pairs. In 15% one observer judged a reflex pair to be symmetrical while another observer found asymmetry of at least 2 scale units. In a second experiment clinical observation of apparently asymmetrical quadriceps reflexes was compared with measurement by surface electromyography. A significant, semi-logarithmic relationship was found between clinical scores and measured reflex amplitudes. Measured reflex asymmetry always agreed with clinical asymmetry, and the magnitudes of right-left amplitude differences were correlated with the magnitude of clinically observed asymmetry. The bedside examination of tendon reflexes is subject to considerable inter-observer disagreement.
通过研究观察者间的一致性来检验腱反射临床检查的可靠性。由三位神经科医生对20名患者进行检查。根据九分制对四肢腱反射的活跃程度进行评分。在160次被检查的反射中,有28%的观察结果相差2个或更多的评分单位。在80对反射中,有45%在是否存在不对称性方面存在分歧。在15%的情况下,一名观察者判断一对反射是对称的,而另一名观察者发现至少有2个评分单位的不对称性。在第二个实验中,将明显不对称的股四头肌反射的临床观察结果与表面肌电图测量结果进行了比较。发现临床评分与测量的反射幅度之间存在显著的半对数关系。测量的反射不对称性总是与临床不对称性一致,左右幅度差异的大小与临床观察到的不对称性大小相关。腱反射的床边检查存在相当大的观察者间分歧。