• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

红细胞分布宽度与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛临床结局的关系:一项3年随访研究

The relationship between red blood cell distribution width and the clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris: a 3-year follow-up.

作者信息

Gul Mehmet, Uyarel Huseyin, Ergelen Mehmet, Karacimen Denizhan, Ugur Murat, Turer Ayca, Bozbay Mehmet, Ayhan Erkan, Akgul Ozgur, Uslu Nevzat

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):330-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564986.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564986
PMID:22735091
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW), a marker of variation in the size of the circulating red blood cells, was evaluated in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina pectoris (UAP).

BACKGROUND

Higher RDW is associated with mortality in the general population, particularly in those with symptomatic cardiovascular disease, and heart failure. We hypothesized that admission RDW might be predictive of adverse clinical outcomes for patients with NSTEMI and UAP.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 310 patients with NSTEMI and UAP (mean age 59.3±11.9 years; 236 men, 74 women) in this study. Admission RDW was measured and the study population was classified on the basis of RDW tertiles. A high RDW (n=95) was defined as a value in the upper third tertile (>14%) and a low RDW (n=215) was defined as any value in the lower two tertiles (≤14%). The patients were followed up for clinical outcomes for up to 3 years after discharge.

RESULTS

In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the 3-year mortality rate was 19% in the high RDW group versus 5.6% in the low RDW group (P<0.001). In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an RDW value of more than 14% yielded a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 72.5%. A significant association was found between a high admission RDW level and the adjusted risk of cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-7.78, P=0.01).

CONCLUSION

RDW is a readily available clinical laboratory value associated with long-term cardiovascular mortality in NSTEMI and UAP.

摘要

目的

对非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)和不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)患者评估红细胞分布宽度(RDW),这是循环红细胞大小变化的一个指标。

背景

较高的RDW与普通人群的死亡率相关,尤其是有症状性心血管疾病和心力衰竭的人群。我们假设入院时的RDW可能是NSTEMI和UAP患者不良临床结局的预测指标。

方法

本研究前瞻性纳入310例NSTEMI和UAP患者(平均年龄59.3±11.9岁;男性236例,女性74例)。测量入院时的RDW,并根据RDW三分位数对研究人群进行分类。高RDW(n = 95)定义为处于上三分位数的值(>14%),低RDW(n = 215)定义为处于下两个三分位数的任何值(≤14%)。患者出院后随访长达3年的临床结局。

结果

在Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,高RDW组的3年死亡率为19%,而低RDW组为5.6%(P<0.001)。在受试者工作特征曲线分析中,RDW值超过14%时,敏感性为6

相似文献

1
The relationship between red blood cell distribution width and the clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris: a 3-year follow-up.红细胞分布宽度与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛临床结局的关系:一项3年随访研究
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):330-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564986.
2
Elevated red cell distribution width level predicts worse postinterventional thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow reflecting abnormal reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction treated with a primary coronary intervention.红细胞分布宽度水平升高预示着在接受直接冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者中,介入后溶栓时心肌梗死血流情况较差,反映出再灌注异常。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Jan;23(1):68-72. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32834f1188.
3
Usefulness of red cell distribution width in predicting all-cause long-term mortality after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.红细胞分布宽度在预测非ST段抬高型心肌梗死后全因长期死亡率中的作用
Cardiology. 2011;119(2):72-80. doi: 10.1159/000329920. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
4
Predictive value of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in clinical outcomes of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina pectoris: a 3-year follow-up.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值对非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和不稳定型心绞痛患者临床结局的预测价值:3 年随访。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014 May;20(4):378-84. doi: 10.1177/1076029612465669. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
Relationship Between Red Cell Distribution Width and the GRACE Risk Score With In-Hospital Death in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者红细胞分布宽度与GRACE风险评分及院内死亡的关系
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2014 Sep;20(6):577-82. doi: 10.1177/1076029613500707. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
6
Circulating high-mobility group box 1 and cardiovascular mortality in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.循环高迁移率族蛋白 1 与不稳定型心绞痛和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的心血管死亡率。
Atherosclerosis. 2012 Apr;221(2):490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.01.040. Epub 2012 Feb 1.
7
Usefulness of admission red cell distribution width as a predictor of early mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.入院时红细胞分布宽度对急性肺栓塞患者早期死亡率的预测价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jan 1;109(1):128-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
8
Relation between red cell distribution width and clinical outcomes after acute myocardial infarction.红细胞分布宽度与急性心肌梗死患者临床预后的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 1;105(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.09.027. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
9
Impact of red blood cell distribution width on long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.红细胞分布宽度对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者长期死亡率的影响。
Cardiology. 2014;128(4):343-8. doi: 10.1159/000359994. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
10
Red blood cell distribution width is a predictor of readmission in cardiac patients.红细胞分布宽度是心脏病人再入院的预测指标。
Clin Cardiol. 2013 May;36(5):293-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22116. Epub 2013 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of shear wave elastography combined with red blood cell distribution width in evaluating arterial erectile dysfunction.剪切波弹性成像联合红细胞分布宽度评估动脉性勃起功能障碍的价值。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01579-5.
2
Predictors of Revascularization in Patients with Unstable Angina.不稳定型心绞痛患者血管重建的预测因素
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 15;13(4):1096. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041096.
3
Red Cell Distribution Width and Elongation Index in a Cohort of Patients With Juvenile Acute Myocardial Infarction.
红细胞分布宽度和伸长指数在青少年急性心肌梗死患者队列中的研究。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231186148. doi: 10.1177/10760296231186148.
4
Red Blood Cell Distribution Width: A Risk Factor for Prognosis in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.红细胞分布宽度:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后缺血性心肌病患者预后的一个危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 16;12(4):1584. doi: 10.3390/jcm12041584.
5
Higher Preoperative Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Increases the Risk of Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery in Advanced-Age Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.术前较高的红细胞分布宽度增加高龄患者非心脏手术后心肌损伤的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Feb 11;18:169-179. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S392778. eCollection 2023.
6
Correlation between red blood cell distribution width, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and neutrophil to platelet ratio with 3-month prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective study.红细胞分布宽度、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及中性粒细胞与血小板比值与脑出血患者 3 个月预后的相关性:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Neurol. 2022 May 24;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02721-2.
7
Value of Hematological and Coagulation Parameters as Prognostic Factors in Acute Coronary Syndromes.血液学和凝血参数作为急性冠脉综合征预后因素的价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 9;11(5):850. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050850.
8
RDW Value may Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy of MPS.红细胞分布宽度(RDW)值可能会提高骨髓增殖性疾病(MPS)的诊断准确性。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2021 Mar 17;55(1):76-80. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2019.58159. eCollection 2021.
9
Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients.上消化道出血患者急性冠状动脉综合征的危险因素
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2021 Mar 8;2021:8816805. doi: 10.1155/2021/8816805. eCollection 2021.
10
The Impact of Red Cell Distribution Width on the Development of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease who Underwent Coronary Angiography.红细胞分布宽度对接受冠状动脉造影的稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者发生造影剂肾病的影响。
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2018 Sep 28;52(3):190-195. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.75537. eCollection 2018.