Suppr超能文献

在急性冠状动脉综合征治疗中使用已证实有效的治疗方法:不同巴西地区之间的比较。巴西急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究(BRACE)分析。

Use of demonstrably effective therapies in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: comparison between different Brazilian regions. Analysis of the Brazilian Registry on Acute Coronary Syndromes (BRACE).

机构信息

Instituto do Coração (InCOr) - Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Apr;98(4):282-9. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000400001.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known in our country about regional differences in the treatment of acute coronary disease.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the behavior regarding the use of demonstrably effective regional therapies in acute coronary disease.

METHODS

A total of 71 hospitals were randomly selected, respecting the proportionality of the country in relation to geographic location, among other criteria. In the overall population was regionally analyzed the use of aspirin, clopidogrel, ACE inhibitors / AT1 blocker, beta-blockers and statins, separately and grouped by individual score ranging from 0 (no drug used) to 100 (all drugs used). In myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI) regional differences were analyzed regarding the use of therapeutic recanalization (fibrinolytics and primary angioplasty).

RESULTS

In the overall population, within the first 24 hours of hospitalization, the mean score in the North-Northeast (70.5 ± 22.1) was lower (p <0.05) than in the Southeast (77.7 ± 29.5), Midwest (82 ± 22.1) and South (82.4 ± 21) regions. At hospital discharge, the score of the North-Northeast region (61.4 ± 32.9) was lower (p <0.05) than in the Southeast (69.2 ± 31.6), Midwest (65.3 ± 33.6) and South (73.7 ± 28.1) regions; additionally, the score of the Midwest was lower (p <0.05) than the South region. In STEMI, the use of recanalization therapies was highest in the Southeast (75.4%, p = 0.001 compared to the rest of the country), and lowest in the North-Northeast (52.5%, p <0.001 compared to the rest of the country).

CONCLUSION

The use of demonstrably effective therapies in the treatment of acute coronary disease is much to be desired in the country, with important regional differences.

摘要

背景

在我国,对于急性冠脉疾病的治疗方面的地区差异知之甚少。

目的

分析急性冠脉疾病中明显有效的区域治疗方法的应用行为。

方法

共随机选择了 71 家医院,根据地理位置等标准,考虑到全国的比例。在总体人群中,分别分析了阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、ACE 抑制剂/AT1 阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂和他汀类药物的使用情况,并按个体评分(0 表示未使用药物,100 表示使用了所有药物)进行分组。对于 ST 段抬高的心肌梗死(STEMI)患者,分析了溶栓和直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的应用情况。

结果

在总体人群中,在住院的头 24 小时内,东北地区(70.5 ± 22.1)的平均评分低于东南部(77.7 ± 29.5)、中西部(82 ± 22.1)和南部(82.4 ± 21)地区(p<0.05)。出院时,东北地区(61.4 ± 32.9)的评分低于东南部(69.2 ± 31.6)、中西部(65.3 ± 33.6)和南部(73.7 ± 28.1)地区(p<0.05);此外,中西部地区的评分也低于南部地区(p<0.05)。在 STEMI 患者中,东南部地区溶栓治疗的使用率最高(75.4%,与全国其他地区相比,p=0.001),而东北地区的使用率最低(52.5%,与全国其他地区相比,p<0.001)。

结论

我国在急性冠脉疾病治疗中,明显有效的治疗方法的应用还远远不够,而且存在重要的地区差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验