• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖硅耳模型中的抽吸噪声。

Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.

机构信息

ENT Clinic Frohnleiten, Am Tabor 4, 8130 Frohnleiten, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2291-3. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2090-8. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s00405-012-2090-8
PMID:22740154
Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate noise levels generated during micro-suction aural toilet using an anatomic silicon ear model. It is an experimental study. In an anatomic ear model made of silicone, the eardrum was replaced by a 1-cm diameter microphone of a calibrated sound-level measuring device. Ear wax was removed using the sucker of a standard ENT treatment unit (Atmos Servant 5(®)). Mean and peak sound levels during the suction procedure were recorded with suckers of various diameters (Fergusson-Frazier 2.7-4 mm as well as Rosen 1.4-2.5 mm). Average noise levels during normal suction in a distance of 1 cm in front of the eardrum ranged between 97 and 103.5 dB(A) (broadband noise). Peak noise levels reached 118 dB(A). During partial obstruction of the sucker by cerumen or dermal flakes, peak noise levels reached 146 dB(A). Peak noise levels observed during the so-called clarinet phenomena were independent of the diameter or type of suckers used. Although micro-suction aural toilet is regarded as an established, widespread and usually safe method to clean the external auditory canal, some caution seems advisable. The performance of long-lasting suction periods straight in front of the eardrum without sound-protecting earwax between sucker and eardrum should be avoided. In particular, when clarinet phenomena are occurring (as described above), the suction procedure should be aborted immediately. In the presence of dermal flakes blocking the auditory canal, cleaning with micro-forceps or other non-suctioning instruments might represent a reasonable alternative.

摘要

本研究旨在评估使用解剖硅耳模型进行微吸耳垢时产生的噪声水平。这是一项实验研究。在由硅树脂制成的解剖耳模型中,用校准声音级测量装置的 1 厘米直径麦克风替换鼓膜。使用标准 ENT 治疗单元(Atmos Servant 5(®))的吸盘去除耳垢。用不同直径的吸盘(Fergusson-Frazier 2.7-4 毫米和 Rosen 1.4-2.5 毫米)记录抽吸过程中的平均和峰值声级。在鼓膜前 1 厘米距离处正常抽吸期间,平均噪声水平在 97 至 103.5 dB(A)(宽带噪声)之间。峰值噪声水平达到 118 dB(A)。当吸盘被耳垢或皮屑部分阻塞时,峰值噪声水平达到 146 dB(A)。在所谓的单簧管现象期间观察到的峰值噪声水平与使用的吸盘直径或类型无关。尽管微吸耳垢被认为是一种已建立的、广泛使用且通常安全的清洁外耳道的方法,但似乎需要谨慎。应避免在鼓膜前持续长时间抽吸而没有吸盘和鼓膜之间的隔音耳垢。特别是当出现单簧管现象(如上所述)时,应立即停止抽吸程序。在有皮屑阻塞耳道的情况下,使用微夹或其他非抽吸器械进行清洁可能是一种合理的替代方法。

相似文献

1
Suction-generated noise in an anatomic silicon ear model.解剖硅耳模型中的抽吸噪声。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2291-3. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2090-8. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
2
[Suction-generated noise levels during aural toilet].[耳部冲洗时吸力产生的噪音水平]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Feb;91(2):103-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295464. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
3
Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.微吸耳腔冲洗时外耳道内产生的噪音水平及其对听力的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x.
4
The Loudness of Suctioning in the Ear Canal.耳道内吸引的响度。
Cureus. 2021 Mar 31;13(3):e14208. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14208.
5
Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum.耳内吸引时的声音水平:吸引头大小、耳道湿度及与鼓膜距离的影响
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul 20;5(4):766-772. doi: 10.1002/lio2.432. eCollection 2020 Aug.
6
In vitro efficacy of a consumer-marketed ear cleaning tool.一种市售的耳部清洁工具的体外疗效。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):e195-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000364.
7
Re: Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet.回复:微型吸引耳道清洗过程中外耳道内产生的噪音水平
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):494-6; author reply 496. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02000.x.
8
Sensorineural hearing loss after vibration: an animal model for evaluating prevention and treatment of inner ear hearing loss.振动后感音神经性听力损失:一种用于评估内耳听力损失防治的动物模型。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jan;121(2):143-8. doi: 10.1080/000164801300043244.
9
Suction tube noise and myringotomy.
J Laryngol Otol. 1980 Apr;94(4):383-6. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100088976.
10
[Removal of impacted cerumen by irrigation of the external auditory canal - Step-by-step].[通过外耳道冲洗清除耵聍栓塞 - 分步操作]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2020 Mar;145(6):406-411. doi: 10.1055/a-0940-8290. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Are orthopaedic trauma surgeons at risk of occupational noise-induced hearing loss?骨科创伤外科医生有职业性噪声性听力损失的风险吗?
OTA Int. 2025 Aug 25;8(3):e422. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000422. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
[The professional ear user-implications for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of ear diseases].[专业耳部使用者——对耳部疾病预防、诊断及治疗的启示]
HNO. 2022 Dec;70(12):891-902. doi: 10.1007/s00106-022-01235-0. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
3
Sound levels with aural suctioning: Effects of suction size, canal moisture, and distance from the eardrum.

本文引用的文献

1
[Suction-generated noise levels during aural toilet].[耳部冲洗时吸力产生的噪音水平]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2012 Feb;91(2):103-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295464. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
2
[Acute hearing impairment by extremely high sound pressure levels].
HNO. 2010 Feb;58(2):106-9. doi: 10.1007/s00106-009-2059-0.
3
Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.微吸耳腔冲洗时外耳道内产生的噪音水平及其对听力的影响:一项前瞻性对照研究。
耳内吸引时的声音水平:吸引头大小、耳道湿度及与鼓膜距离的影响
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Jul 20;5(4):766-772. doi: 10.1002/lio2.432. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Modifications of Surgical Suction Tip Geometry for Flow Optimisation: Influence on Suction-Induced Noise Pollution.用于流量优化的手术吸引头几何形状的修改:对吸引引起的噪声污染的影响。
Surg Res Pract. 2018 Nov 21;2018:3074819. doi: 10.1155/2018/3074819. eCollection 2018.
5
In vitro efficacy of a consumer-marketed ear cleaning tool.一种市售的耳部清洁工具的体外疗效。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jun;35(5):e195-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000364.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):21-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01841.x.
4
Acoustical factors of noise created by suctioning middle ear fluid.抽吸中耳积液产生的噪声的声学因素。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jul;119(7):762-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880190058012.
5
Raised ABR threshold after suction aspiration of glue from the middle ear: three case studies.从中耳吸出胶水后听性脑干反应阈值升高:三例病例研究
J Laryngol Otol. 1995 Aug;109(8):726-8. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100131159.
6
Drill- and suction-generated noise in mastoid surgery.乳突手术中钻孔和吸引产生的噪音。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1980 Feb;106(2):92-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1980.00790260024008.
7
Suction tube noise and myringotomy.
J Laryngol Otol. 1980 Apr;94(4):383-6. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100088976.
8
Suction-generated noise in the external meatus and sensorineural hearing loss.
J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Sep;96(9):857-63. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100093191.