University of Massachusetts Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 55 Lake Avenue North, WSH 8B, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jul-Aug;30(4):487-505. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2015. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Juvenile probation officers (JPOs) are required to make numerous decisions about the case management of young offenders on a daily basis. This multi-site study examined JPOs' (N=64) perceptions of the typical youth's risk of reoffending before implementation of a risk/needs assessment (RNA) tool, and their self-reported, case management decision-making after implementation of an RNA tool. Results indicated that JPOs tended to overestimate the likely base rates of reoffending while RNA tool estimates were more accurate. Further, most JPOs appeared to be making service referral and placement decisions commensurate with youths' risk levels, regardless of whether they claimed to use the RNA tool in their decisions. Variability in application of risk to case management practices was more a function of the probation office than of the specific JPO. Implications for use of risk assessment in juvenile probation are discussed.
少年缓刑监督官(JPO)每天都需要对未成年犯的案件管理做出大量决策。这项多地点研究调查了 JPO(N=64)在实施风险/需求评估(RNA)工具之前对典型青少年再犯罪风险的看法,以及他们在实施 RNA 工具后报告的、与案件管理相关的决策。结果表明,JPO 往往高估了再犯罪的可能基础率,而 RNA 工具的评估则更为准确。此外,大多数 JPO 似乎都根据青少年的风险水平做出了服务推荐和安置决策,而不管他们是否声称在决策中使用了 RNA 工具。将风险应用于案件管理实践的差异更多地是由缓刑办公室而不是特定的 JPO 决定的。本文讨论了在少年缓刑中使用风险评估的意义。