• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一次性活检钳在上消化道内镜检查中的性能与成本:与可重复使用活检钳的比较。

Performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps.

作者信息

Lim Chul-Hyun, Choi Myung-Gyu, Kim Won Chul, Kim Jin Soo, Cho Yu Kyung, Park Jae Myung, Lee In Seok, Kim Sang Woo, Choi Kyu Yong, Chung In-Sik

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Endosc. 2012 Mar;45(1):62-6. doi: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62. Epub 2012 Mar 31.

DOI:10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62
PMID:22741133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3363127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue.

RESULTS

Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as ₩8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps.

CONCLUSIONS

Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.

摘要

背景/目的:人们认为一次性活检钳比可重复使用的活检钳成本更高。在本研究中,我们评估了一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳在食管胃十二指肠镜活检中的性能和成本。

方法

2009年10月至2010年7月期间,我们纳入了在首尔圣玛丽医院接受食管胃十二指肠镜活检的200例患者。通过随机分配,分别使用100把一次性活检钳或5把可重复使用的活检钳进行活检。另外对75例患者进行研究以评估可重复使用活检钳的耐用性。辅助护士对活检钳的性能进行评估。成本评估包括购买价格和再处理成本。根据所获取组织的直径评估样本的充足性。

结果

一次性活检钳的性能评估为优秀的占97.0%,良好的占2.0%,足够的占1.0%。可重复使用活检钳的性能评估为优秀的占36.0%,良好的占36.0%,足够的占25.1%,不足的占2.9%。可重复使用活检钳的性能随着使用次数的增加而下降。一次活检操作中可重复使用活检钳的再处理成本计算为8021韩元。两种活检钳所取样本的充足性均为优秀。

结论

一次性活检钳表现出优异的性能。考虑到可重复使用活检钳的再处理成本,应考虑使用价格低廉的一次性活检钳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/5e066c5301dc/ce-45-62-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/b15354320842/ce-45-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/51582b43d0d9/ce-45-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/2be84e1c660f/ce-45-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/5e066c5301dc/ce-45-62-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/b15354320842/ce-45-62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/51582b43d0d9/ce-45-62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/2be84e1c660f/ce-45-62-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a15/3363127/5e066c5301dc/ce-45-62-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Performance and cost of disposable biopsy forceps in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with reusable biopsy forceps.一次性活检钳在上消化道内镜检查中的性能与成本:与可重复使用活检钳的比较。
Clin Endosc. 2012 Mar;45(1):62-6. doi: 10.5946/ce.2012.45.1.62. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
2
A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.可重复使用与一次性使用内镜活检钳的性能、安全性及成本比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):257-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70351-8.
3
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳:一项前瞻性成本评估。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):262-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70352-x.
4
A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.一次性和可重复使用活检钳在胃肠内镜检查中的成本与性能评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70353-1.
5
[Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital].[一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳。第戎大学医院胃肠内镜科的前瞻性成本分析]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001 Jun-Jul;25(6-7):669-73.
6
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.胃肠内镜检查中一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳的成本最小化分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):226-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.341.
7
Cost-minimization analysis of jumbo reusable forceps versus disposable forceps in a high-volume ambulatory endoscopy center.大容量门诊内镜中心使用大型可重复使用钳与一次性钳的成本最小化分析。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2):284-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.062. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
8
Biopsy forceps: disposable or reusable?活检钳:一次性还是可重复使用?
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2001 Mar-Apr;24(2):64-8. doi: 10.1097/00001610-200103000-00004.
9
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective evaluation of costs.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Jan;43(1):10-3. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70252-3.
10
Reusable biopsy forceps: a cost-effective measure for the endoscopy suite.可重复使用活检钳:一种适用于内镜室的经济有效措施。
Gastroenterol Nurs. 1995 Sep-Oct;18(5):167-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-use versus multiple-use accessories in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review of economic evaluations.胃肠内镜检查中一次性与多次使用附件:经济评估的系统评价
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 May 14;12(1):e001712. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001712.
2
[Resource conservation from the perspective of infection prevention].从感染预防角度看资源节约
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Mar;94(3):220-229. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01784-8. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories.

本文引用的文献

1
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy: a cost-minimization analysis.胃肠内镜检查中一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳的成本最小化分析
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Aug;58(2):226-9. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.341.
2
A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy.一次性和可重复使用活检钳在胃肠内镜检查中的成本与性能评估
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70353-1.
3
Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: a prospective cost evaluation.一次性活检钳与可重复使用活检钳:一项前瞻性成本评估。
《柔性胃肠道内镜及内镜附件再处理多学科多学会实践指南》
Clin Endosc. 2020 May;53(3):276-285. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.106. Epub 2020 May 29.
4
Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing.韩国胃肠内镜学会内镜再处理指南
Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar;50(2):143-147. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.029. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
5
Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps.评估使用可重复使用或一次性镊子采集的胃肠道样本的质量和充分性。
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Jul;30(4):1002-7. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14354. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection.临床内镜检查在强化内镜消毒方面的作用。
Clin Endosc. 2015 Sep;48(5):351-5. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.351. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
7
High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing.胃肠道内窥镜再处理的高水平消毒
World J Exp Med. 2015 Feb 20;5(1):33-9. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v5.i1.33.
8
Current status of endoscope reprocessing in Korea.韩国内镜再处理的现状
Clin Endosc. 2015 Jan;48(1):1-3. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.1. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
9
Steps of reprocessing and equipments.再处理步骤及设备。
Clin Endosc. 2013 May;46(3):274-9. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.274. Epub 2013 May 31.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):262-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70352-x.
4
A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial.可重复使用与一次性使用内镜活检钳的性能、安全性及成本比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Mar;51(3):257-61. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(00)70351-8.
5
Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy.结肠镜检查期间丙型肝炎病毒的患者间传播。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 24;337(4):237-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199707243370404.
6
Endoscopic transmission of Helicobacter pylori.幽门螺杆菌的内镜传播
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995;9 Suppl 2:105-10.
7
Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.通过胃肠内镜检查和支气管镜检查传播感染。
Ann Intern Med. 1993 Jan 15;118(2):117-28. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00008.
8
Identification of Helicobacter pylori DNA in the mouths and stomachs of patients with gastritis using PCR.运用聚合酶链反应(PCR)鉴定胃炎患者口腔和胃中的幽门螺杆菌DNA。
J Clin Pathol. 1993 Jun;46(6):540-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.6.540.
9
APIC guidelines for infection prevention and control in flexible endoscopy. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. 1991, 1992, and 1993 APIC Guidelines Committee.《软性内镜感染预防与控制的APIC指南》。感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会,1991年、1992年及1993年APIC指南委员会。
Am J Infect Control. 1994 Feb;22(1):19-38. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(94)90087-6.
10
Gastrointestinal endoscopy: infection and disinfection.胃肠内镜检查:感染与消毒
Gut. 1983 Nov;24(11):1067-77. doi: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1067.