Peterson Margaret G E, Gaeta Theodore J, Birkhahn Robert H, Fernández José L, Mancuso Carol A
Research Division, Hospital for Special Surgery Weill Cornell Medical College, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Asthma. 2012 Aug;49(6):629-36. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.690480. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
Understanding triggers is important for managing asthma particularly for patients who seek emergency department (ED) care for exacerbations. The objectives of this analysis were to delineate self-reported triggers in ED patients and to assess associations between triggers and asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life.
At the time of an ED visit, 296 patients were asked what were their usual asthma triggers based on a checklist of 25 potential items, and what they thought specifically precipitated their current ED visit. Using standardized scales, patients also were asked about asthma knowledge, severity, and quality of life.
The mean age was 44 years and 72% were women. Patients cited a mean of 12 triggers; most patients had diverse triggers spanning respiratory infections, environmental irritants, emotions, allergens, weather, and exercise. Patients with more triggers were more likely to be women (odds ratio (OR) = 2.0, confidence interval (CI) = 1.3, 3.2, p = .002), obese (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.1, 2.5, p = .01), and to not have a smoking history (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.3, 2.9, p = .001). There were no associations between number of triggers and current age, age at diagnosis, education, socioeconomic status, or race/ethnicity. Patients who cited more triggers had more frequent flares (OR = 1.1, CI = 1.1, 1.2, p < .0001), worse quality of life scores (OR 1.6, CI = 1.1, 2.4, p = .02), and were more likely to have been previously hospitalized for asthma (OR = 1.9, CI = 1.3, 2.9, p = .003) and to have previously required oral corticosteroids (OR = 2.9, CI = 1.6, 5.1, p = .003). There was little clustering of specific triggers according to the variables we considered except for more frequent animal allergy in patients diagnosed at a younger age (OR = 2.8, CI = 1.7, 4.5, p < .0001) and worse quality of life in patients citing emotional stress as a trigger (OR = 2.5, CI = 1.5, 4.0, p = .0002). Patients attributed their current ED visit to multiple precipitants, particularly respiratory infections and weather, and these were concordant with what they reported were known triggers.
Patients presenting to the ED for asthma reported multiple triggers spanning diverse classes of precipitants and having more triggers was associated with worse clinical status. ED patients should be instructed that although it may not be possible to eliminate all triggers, mitigating even some triggers can be helpful.
了解诱发因素对于哮喘管理至关重要,尤其是对于因病情加重而寻求急诊科(ED)治疗的患者。本分析的目的是确定急诊科患者自我报告的诱发因素,并评估诱发因素与哮喘知识、严重程度和生活质量之间的关联。
在急诊科就诊时,根据一份包含25个潜在项目的清单,询问296名患者他们通常的哮喘诱发因素是什么,以及他们认为具体是什么导致了他们此次的急诊科就诊。使用标准化量表,还询问了患者的哮喘知识、严重程度和生活质量。
平均年龄为44岁,72%为女性。患者提及的诱发因素平均有12种;大多数患者有多种诱发因素,包括呼吸道感染、环境刺激物、情绪、过敏原、天气和运动。诱发因素较多的患者更可能为女性(优势比(OR)=2.0,置信区间(CI)=1.3,3.2,p = 0.002)、肥胖(OR = 1.7,CI = 1.1,2.5,p = 0.01)且无吸烟史(OR = 1.9,CI = 1.3,2.9,p = 0.001)。诱发因素数量与当前年龄、诊断年龄、教育程度、社会经济地位或种族/民族之间无关联。提及诱发因素较多的患者发作更频繁(OR = 1.1,CI = 1.1,1.2,p < 0.0001)、生活质量得分更差(OR 1.6,CI = 1.1,2.4,p = 0.02),并且更可能曾因哮喘住院(OR = 1.9,CI = 1.3,2.9,p = 0.003)以及曾需要口服糖皮质激素(OR = 2.9,CI = 1.6,5.1,p = 0.003)。除了在较年轻时被诊断出的患者中动物过敏更频繁(OR = 2.8,CI = 1.7,4.5,p < 0.0001)以及将情绪压力作为诱发因素的患者生活质量更差(OR = 2.5,CI = 1.5,4.0,p = 0.0002)外,根据我们考虑的变量,特定诱发因素几乎没有聚类情况。患者将他们此次的急诊科就诊归因于多种诱发因素,尤其是呼吸道感染和天气,并且这些与他们报告的已知诱发因素一致。
因哮喘到急诊科就诊的患者报告了多种跨越不同类型诱发因素的诱发因素,诱发因素较多与更差的临床状况相关。应告知急诊科患者,尽管可能无法消除所有诱发因素,但减轻甚至一些诱发因素可能会有所帮助。