School of Economics, Singapore Management University, 90 Stamford Road, 178903, Singapore.
Stat Med. 2012 Oct 30;31(24):2833-43. doi: 10.1002/sim.5467. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
Non-inferiority (NI) trials are becoming increasingly popular. The main purpose of NI trials is to assert the efficacy of a new treatment compared with an active control by demonstrating that the new treatment maintains a substantial fraction of the treatment effect of the control. Most of the statistical testing procedures in this area have been developed for three-arm NI trials in which a new treatment is compared with an active control in the presence of a placebo. However, NI trials frequently involve comparisons of several new treatments with a control, such as in studies involving different doses of a new drug or different combinations of several new drugs. In seeking an adequate testing procedure for such cases, we use a new approach that modifies existing testing procedures to cover circumstances in which several new treatments are present. We also give methods and algorithms to produce the optimal sample size configuration. In addition, we also discuss the advantages of using different margins for the assay sensitivity test between the active control and the placebo and the NI test between the new treatments and the active control. We illustrate the new approach by using data from a clinical trial.
非劣效(NI)试验越来越受欢迎。NI 试验的主要目的是通过证明新治疗方法保持了对照治疗效果的很大一部分,从而断言新治疗方法与活性对照相比的疗效。该领域的大多数统计检验程序都是为三臂 NI 试验开发的,其中新治疗方法与安慰剂同时与活性对照进行比较。然而,NI 试验经常涉及与对照比较几种新的治疗方法,例如在涉及新药不同剂量或几种新药不同组合的研究中。在寻求此类情况下的适当检验程序时,我们使用一种新方法来修改现有的检验程序,以涵盖存在几种新治疗方法的情况。我们还提供了方法和算法来生成最佳样本量配置。此外,我们还讨论了在活性对照和安慰剂之间的检测灵敏度检验以及新治疗方法和活性对照之间的 NI 检验中使用不同边际的优势。我们通过使用临床试验中的数据来说明新方法。