Cantor James M
Law & Mental Health Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2012 Jan;11(1):59-62. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2012.672945. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
In her recent article, Hebephilia: Quintessence of Diagnostic Pretextuality (published in Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2010), Karen Franklin expands on her previous argument that psychologists and psychiatrists should not diagnose as abnormal hebephilia, the sexual preference for early pubescent children. She supports her argument with a series of claims about the contents of the empirical literature and the scientists who produced it. The present document provides fact-checking of those claims, revealing that Franklin's conclusions are based largely on demonstrable falsehoods.
在她最近发表于《行为科学与法律》(2010年)的文章《恋童癖:诊断借口的精髓》中,凯伦·富兰克林进一步阐述了她之前的观点,即心理学家和精神科医生不应将对青春期前儿童的性偏好——恋童癖诊断为异常。她通过一系列关于实证文献内容以及撰写这些文献的科学家的主张来支持自己的观点。本文件对这些主张进行了事实核查,发现富兰克林的结论很大程度上基于明显的谬误。