Centre for Pharmacoeconomics Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China SAR.
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039640. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
Dabigatran is associated with lower rate of stroke comparing to warfarin when anticoagulation control is sub-optimal. Genotype-guided warfarin dosing and management may improve patient-time in target range (TTR) and therefore affect the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfain. We examined the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran versus warfarin therapy with genotype-guided management in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A Markov model was designed to compare life-long economic and treatment outcomes of dabigatran (110 mg and 150 mg twice daily), warfarin usual anticoagulation care (usual AC) with mean TTR 64%, and genotype-guided anticoagulation care (genotype-guided AC) in a hypothetical cohort of AF patients aged 65 years old with CHADS(2) score 2. Model inputs were derived from literature. The genotype-guided AC was assumed to achieve TTR = 78.9%, adopting the reported TTR achieved by warfarin service with good anticoagulation control in literature. Outcome measure was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (ICER) from perspective of healthcare payers. In base-case analysis, dabigatran 150 mg gained higher QALYs than genotype-guided AC (10.065QALYs versus 9.554QALYs) at higher cost (USD92,684 versus USD85,627) with ICER = USD13,810. Dabigatran 110 mg and usual AC gained less QALYs but cost more than dabigatran 150 mg and genotype-guided AC, respectively. ICER of dabigatran 150 mg versus genotype-guided AC would be >USD50,000 (and genotype-guided AC would be most cost-effective) when TTR in genotype-guided AC was >77% and utility value of warfarin was the same or higher than that of dabigatran.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The likelihood of genotype-guided anticoagulation service to be accepted as cost-effective would increase if the quality of life on warfarin and dabigatran therapy are compatible and genotype-guided service achieves high TTR (>77%).
与华法林相比,达比加群在抗凝控制不理想时发生卒中的风险较低。基因指导的华法林剂量调整和管理可能会提高患者的目标治疗范围(TTR)时间,从而影响达比加群与华法林相比的成本效益。我们研究了基因指导管理的达比加群与华法林治疗在房颤(AF)患者中的成本效益。
方法/主要发现:设计了一个马尔可夫模型,以比较达比加群(110mg 和 150mg,每日两次)、华法林常规抗凝治疗(常规 AC,TTR 平均 64%)和基因指导抗凝治疗(基因指导 AC)在年龄为 65 岁、CHADS2 评分为 2 的假设 AF 患者队列中的终生经济和治疗结果。模型输入来自文献。假设基因指导 AC 可实现 TTR=78.9%,采用文献中报告的华法林服务在良好抗凝控制下实现的 TTR。结果测量指标是从医疗保健支付方角度计算的每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本(ICER)。在基础案例分析中,达比加群 150mg 的 QALY 高于基因指导 AC(10.065QALYs 比 9.554QALYs),但成本更高(92684 美元比 85627 美元),ICER 为 13810 美元。达比加群 110mg 和常规 AC 的 QALY 较少,但成本高于达比加群 150mg 和基因指导 AC。当基因指导 AC 中的 TTR 超过 77%且华法林的效用值与达比加群相同或更高时,达比加群 150mg 与基因指导 AC 的 ICER 将超过 50000 美元(并且基因指导 AC 将是最具成本效益的)。
结论/意义:如果华法林和达比加群治疗的生活质量相兼容,并且基因指导服务实现了较高的 TTR(>77%),那么接受基因指导抗凝服务的可能性将增加。