Zhang Yuting, Baik Seo Hyon, Zhou Lei, Reynolds Charles F, Lave Judith R
Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;69(7):672-9. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1402.
Maintenance antidepressant pharmacotherapy in late life prevents recurrent episodes of major depression. The coverage gap in Medicare Part D could increase the likelihood of reducing appropriate use of antidepressants, thereby exposing older adults to an increased risk for relapse of depressive episodes.
To determine whether (1) beneficiaries reduce antidepressant use in the gap, (2) the reduction in antidepressant use is similar to the reduction in heart failure medications and antidiabetics, (3) the provision of generic coverage reduces the risk of reduction of medication use, and (4) medical spending increases in the gap.
Observational before-after study with a comparison group design.
A 5% random sample of US Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with depression (n = 65,223) enrolled in stand-alone Part D plans in 2007.
Antidepressant pharmacotherapy, physician, outpatient, and inpatient spending.
Being in the gap was associated with comparable reductions in the use of antidepressants, heart failure medications, and antidiabetics. Relative to the comparison group (those who had full coverage in the gap because of Medicare coverage or low-income subsidies), the no-coverage group reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 12.1% (95% CI, 9.9%-14.3%) from the pregap level, whereas they reduced use of heart failure drugs and antidiabetics by 12.9% and 13.4%, respectively. Those with generic drug coverage in the gap reduced their monthly antidepressant prescriptions by 6.9% (95% CI, 4.8%-9.1%); this decrease was entirely attributable to the reduction in the use of brand-name antidepressants. Medicare spending on medical care did not increase for either group relative to the comparison group.
The Medicare Part D coverage gap was associated with modest reductions in the use of antidepressants. Those with generic coverage reduced their use of brand-name drugs and did not switch from brand-name to generic drugs. The reduction in antidepressant use was not associated with an increase in nondrug medical spending.
老年期维持性抗抑郁药物治疗可预防重度抑郁症的复发。医疗保险D部分的覆盖缺口可能会增加减少抗抑郁药物合理使用的可能性,从而使老年人面临抑郁发作复发风险增加的问题。
确定(1)受益人群在覆盖缺口中是否会减少抗抑郁药物的使用;(2)抗抑郁药物使用的减少是否与心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物使用的减少相似;(3)提供仿制药覆盖是否会降低药物使用减少的风险;(4)在覆盖缺口中医疗支出是否会增加。
采用对照组设计的前后观察性研究。
2007年参加独立D部分计划的65岁及以上患有抑郁症的美国医疗保险受益人的5%随机样本(n = 65,223)。
抗抑郁药物治疗、医生、门诊和住院支出。
处于覆盖缺口中与抗抑郁药物、心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物使用的可比减少相关。与对照组(因医疗保险覆盖或低收入补贴而在覆盖缺口中享有全额覆盖的人群)相比,无覆盖组的每月抗抑郁药物处方量比缺口前水平减少了12.1%(95%置信区间,9.9%-14.3%),而他们的心力衰竭药物和抗糖尿病药物使用量分别减少了12.9%和13.4%。在覆盖缺口中有仿制药覆盖的人群每月抗抑郁药物处方量减少了6.9%(95%置信区间,4.8%-9.1%);这种减少完全归因于品牌名抗抑郁药物使用的减少。相对于对照组,两组的医疗保险医疗支出均未增加。
医疗保险D部分的覆盖缺口与抗抑郁药物使用的适度减少相关。有仿制药覆盖的人群减少了品牌名药物的使用,且未从品牌名药物转向仿制药。抗抑郁药物使用的减少与非药物医疗支出的增加无关。