Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Depress Anxiety. 2012 Oct;29(10):906-13. doi: 10.1002/da.21971. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
This study examines the criterion validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ-9) and 2-item (PHQ-2) version as a depression-screening instrument for adolescents.
Three hundred twenty-two adolescents aged 13-16 were recruited from pediatric hospitals. Criterion validity of the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2 was assessed against diagnoses of any depressive disorder provided by a structured diagnostic interview. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUCs) and sensitivities and specificities at optimal cutoff points were computed for both versions of the PHQ. Besides the dimensional algorithm, a categorical algorithm was applied for the PHQ-9. Validity measures of both scoring procedures of the PHQ-9 as well as PHQ-2 were compared statistically. In addition, unaided clinical depression diagnoses by the attending pediatricians were evaluated.
Using the dimensional algorithm, the AUCof the PHQ-9 (93.2%) was significantly higher than that of the PHQ-2 (87.2%). At optimal cutoffs, there was no significant difference in sensitivity (PHQ-9: 90.0%, PHQ-2: 85.0%), but in specificity (PHQ-9: 86.5%, PHQ-2: 79.4%). Although the categorical algorithm of the PHQ-9 was most specific (94.7%), sensitivity was just above chance (52.5%). The unaided clinical diagnoses yielded a sensitivity of 12.5% and a specificity of 96.0%.
The dimensional algorithm of the PHQ-9 demonstrated high criterion validity, whereas the categorical algorithm should not be applied due to its low sensitivity. Even though the PHQ-2 performed well, validity of the PHQ-9 was still superior. Hence, the PHQ-9 can be recommended as depression screener for adolescents to improve recognition rates in pediatric care.
本研究考察了患者健康问卷 9 项(PHQ-9)和 2 项(PHQ-2)版本作为青少年抑郁筛查工具的标准效度。
从儿科医院招募了 322 名年龄在 13-16 岁的青少年。PHQ-9 和 PHQ-2 的标准效度是通过与结构化诊断访谈提供的任何抑郁障碍诊断进行评估的。计算了这两种 PHQ 版本的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)以及最佳截断点处的敏感性和特异性。除了维度算法外,还对 PHQ-9 应用了分类算法。统计比较了 PHQ-9 的两种评分程序和 PHQ-2 的有效性指标。此外,还评估了主治儿科医生的无辅助临床抑郁诊断。
使用维度算法,PHQ-9 的 AUC(93.2%)显著高于 PHQ-2(87.2%)。在最佳截断点处,敏感性无显著差异(PHQ-9:90.0%,PHQ-2:85.0%),但特异性有显著差异(PHQ-9:86.5%,PHQ-2:79.4%)。虽然 PHQ-9 的分类算法最特异(94.7%),但敏感性仅略高于机会(52.5%)。无辅助临床诊断的敏感性为 12.5%,特异性为 96.0%。
PHQ-9 的维度算法表现出较高的标准效度,而分类算法由于敏感性低,不应应用。尽管 PHQ-2 表现良好,但 PHQ-9 的有效性仍更高。因此,PHQ-9 可作为青少年抑郁筛查工具,以提高儿科护理中的识别率。