London Centre for Nanotechnology, Gordon St., London WC1H 0AH, United Kingdom.
J Chem Phys. 2012 Jun 28;136(24):244105. doi: 10.1063/1.4730035.
We present a detailed study of the energetics of water clusters (H(2)O)(n) with n ≤ 6, comparing diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) and approximate density functional theory (DFT) with well converged coupled-cluster benchmarks. We use the many-body decomposition of the total energy to classify the errors of DMC and DFT into 1-body, 2-body and beyond-2-body components. Using both equilibrium cluster configurations and thermal ensembles of configurations, we find DMC to be uniformly much more accurate than DFT, partly because some of the approximate functionals give poor 1-body distortion energies. Even when these are corrected, DFT remains considerably less accurate than DMC. When both 1- and 2-body errors of DFT are corrected, some functionals compete in accuracy with DMC; however, other functionals remain worse, showing that they suffer from significant beyond-2-body errors. Combining the evidence presented here with the recently demonstrated high accuracy of DMC for ice structures, we suggest how DMC can now be used to provide benchmarks for larger clusters and for bulk liquid water.
我们对水团簇(H2O)(n ≤ 6)的能量进行了详细研究,将扩散蒙特卡罗(DMC)和近似密度泛函理论(DFT)与经过良好收敛的耦合簇基准进行了比较。我们使用总能量的多体分解将 DMC 和 DFT 的误差分类为 1 体、2 体和超过 2 体分量。使用平衡簇构型和构型的热系综,我们发现 DMC 比 DFT 均匀地更准确,部分原因是一些近似泛函给出了较差的 1 体变形能。即使对这些进行了修正,DFT 的准确性仍然明显低于 DMC。当修正 DFT 的 1 体和 2 体误差时,一些泛函在准确性上与 DMC 竞争;然而,其他泛函仍然较差,表明它们存在显著的超过 2 体误差。将这里提出的证据与 DMC 对冰结构的高精度结合起来,我们提出了如何使用 DMC 为更大的簇和液体水提供基准的方法。