Suppr超能文献

应用双探头 CZT 伽马相机进行低剂量分子乳腺成像的概念验证。第一部分。在体模中的评估。

Proof of concept for low-dose molecular breast imaging with a dual-head CZT gamma camera. Part I. Evaluation in phantoms.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6):3466-75. doi: 10.1118/1.4718665.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Molecular breast imaging (MBI) is a nuclear medicine technology that uses dual-head cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) gamma cameras to image functional uptake of a radiotracer, Tc-99m sestamibi, in the breast. An important factor in adoption of MBI in the screening setting is reduction of the necessary administered dose of Tc-99m sestamibi from the typically used dose of 740 MBq to approximately 148 MBq, such that MBI's whole-body effective dose is comparable to that of screening mammography. Methods that increase MBI count sensitivity may allow a proportional reduction in the necessary administered dose. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of two count sensitivity improvement methods on image quality by evaluating count sensitivity, spatial resolution, and lesion contrast in phantom simulations.

METHODS

Two dual-head CZT-based MBI systems were studied: LumaGem and Discovery NM 750b. Two count sensitivity improvement methods were implemented: registered collimators optimized for dedicated breast imaging and widened energy acceptance window optimized for use with CZT. System sensitivity, spatial resolution, and tumor contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured comparing standard collimation and energy window setting [126-154 keV (+10%, -10%)] with optimal collimation and a wide energy window [110-154 keV (+10%, -21%)].

RESULTS

Compared to the standard collimator designs and energy windows for these two systems, use of registered optimized collimation and wide energy window increased system sensitivity by a factor of 2.8-3.6. Spatial resolution decreased slightly for both systems with new collimation. At 3 cm from the collimator face, LumaGem's spatial resolution was 4.8 and 5.6 mm with standard and optimized collimation; Discovery NM 750b's spatial resolution was 4.4 and 4.6 mm with standard and optimized collimation, respectively. For both systems, at tumor depths of 1 and 3 cm, use of optimized collimation and wide energy window significantly improved CNR compared to standard settings for tumors 8.0 and 9.2 mm in diameter. At the closer depth of 1 cm, optimized collimation and wide energy window also significantly improved CNR for 5.9 mm tumors on Discovery NM 750b.

CONCLUSIONS

Registered optimized collimation and wide energy window yield a substantial gain in count sensitivity and measurable gain in CNR, with some loss in spatial resolution compared to the standard collimator designs and energy windows used on these two systems. At low-count densities calculated to represent doses of 148 MBq, this tradeoff results in adequate count density and lesion contrast for detection of lesions ≥8 mm in the middle of a typical breast (3 cm deep) and lesions ≥6 mm close to the collimator (1 cm deep).

摘要

目的

分子乳腺成像(MBI)是一种核医学技术,使用双头碲锌镉(CZT)伽马相机来成像放射性示踪剂 Tc-99m sestamibi 在乳房中的功能摄取。在筛查环境中采用 MBI 的一个重要因素是将 Tc-99m sestamibi 的所需给药剂量从通常使用的 740MBq 减少到约 148MBq,使得 MBI 的全身有效剂量与筛查乳房 X 光摄影相当。增加 MBI 计数灵敏度的方法可能允许相应减少所需的给药剂量。我们的目标是通过评估计数灵敏度、空间分辨率和体模模拟中的病变对比度来评估两种提高计数灵敏度方法对图像质量的影响。

方法

研究了两种基于双头 CZT 的 MBI 系统:LumaGem 和 Discovery NM 750b。实施了两种提高计数灵敏度的方法:专门用于乳腺成像的注册准直器和优化用于 CZT 的宽能窗。通过比较标准准直器和能窗设置(126-154keV[+10%,-10%])与优化的准直器和宽能窗(110-154keV[+10%,-21%]),测量了系统灵敏度、空间分辨率和肿瘤对比噪声比(CNR)。

结果

与这两个系统的标准准直器设计和能窗相比,使用注册优化的准直器和宽能窗将系统灵敏度提高了 2.8-3.6 倍。两个系统的空间分辨率都略有下降,使用新的准直器。在离准直器表面 3cm 处,LumaGem 的空间分辨率分别为 4.8 和 5.6mm,标准和优化的准直器;Discovery NM 750b 的空间分辨率分别为 4.4 和 4.6mm,标准和优化的准直器。对于两个系统,在肿瘤深度为 1cm 和 3cm 时,与标准设置相比,优化的准直器和宽能窗显著提高了直径为 8.0mm 和 9.2mm 的肿瘤的 CNR。在更近的深度 1cm 处,优化的准直器和宽能窗还显著提高了 Discovery NM 750b 上 5.9mm 肿瘤的 CNR。

结论

与这两个系统上使用的标准准直器设计和能窗相比,注册优化的准直器和宽能窗可显著提高计数灵敏度,并可提高 CNR,而空间分辨率略有下降。在代表 148MBq 剂量的低计数密度下,这种权衡在检测中等深度(3cm)乳房中直径≥8mm 的病变和靠近准直器(1cm 深)的直径≥6mm 的病变方面具有足够的计数密度和病变对比度。

相似文献

3
Performance characteristics of dedicated molecular breast imaging systems at low doses.
Med Phys. 2016 Jun;43(6):3062-3070. doi: 10.1118/1.4950873.
5
Evaluation of a novel collimator for molecular breast tomosynthesis.
Med Phys. 2017 Nov;44(11):5740-5748. doi: 10.1002/mp.12564. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
8
Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems.
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):845-56. doi: 10.1118/1.3077119.

引用本文的文献

1
Molecular Breast Imaging Biopsy with a Dual-Detector System.
Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2024 Jun;6(4):e230186. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230186.
2
What scans we will read: imaging instrumentation trends in clinical oncology.
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00312-3.
3
Dedicated Breast Gamma Camera Imaging and Breast PET: Current Status and Future Directions.
PET Clin. 2018 Jul;13(3):363-381. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.02.008.
8
Molecular breast imaging: an emerging modality for breast cancer screening.
Breast Cancer Manag. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):33-40. doi: 10.2217/BMT.14.49.

本文引用的文献

3
Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):98-105. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100655. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
4
Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies.
Radiology. 2010 Oct;257(1):246-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100570. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
5
Molecular breast imaging.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009 Aug;9(8):1073-80. doi: 10.1586/era.09.75.
6
Design of optimal collimation for dedicated molecular breast imaging systems.
Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):845-56. doi: 10.1118/1.3077119.
7
Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Dec;191(6):1805-15. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3693.
8
Scientific Impact Recognition Award: Molecular breast imaging: a review of the Mayo Clinic experience.
Am J Surg. 2008 Oct;196(4):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验