Toso Elisabetta, Blandino Alessandro, Sardi Davide, Battaglia Alberto, Garberoglio Lucia, Miceli Salvatore, Azzaro Giuseppe, Capello Attilio Luca, Gaita Fiorenzo
Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Sep;35(9):1126-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03453.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Current definition of persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF) enrolls a heterogeneous population with different atrial fibrillation (AF) exposure and degree of atrial substrate. Study aims were to evaluate acute and long-term results of electrical cardioversion (ECV) and to identify temporal cutoff of previous AF exposure to reclassify PAF in subgroups with different chance of sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance.
Five hundred twenty-one patients (66% men; age 69 ± 10 years) with PAF undergoing ECV, were divided in four groups according to AF duration at the time of ECV: group A with AF ≤2 months (141 patients); group B with AF >2 and ≤4 months (176 patients); group C with AF >4 and ≤6 months (89 patients); and group D with AF >6 months and <1 year (115 patients).
There was no difference in term of acute success among groups (98.5% vs 97.1% vs 98.9% vs 96.5%, respectively, P = 0.95). At 5-year follow-up, 198 (41%) patients were in SR: 50% in group A, 44% in group B, 42% in group C, and 25% in group D (P < 0.001). At the multivariate analysis, previous ECV (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55, P < 0.001), left atrium enlargement (HR 1.39, P = 0.013), and AF duration >6 months at time of procedure (HR 1.59, P = 0.001) independently predict ECV failure.
ECV is associated with high acute success rate and low complications rate. Long-term results are strongly related with AF duration at time of ECV: a cutoff of >6 months helps in selecting patients that can take greater advantage of the procedure.
目前持续性房颤(PAF)的定义纳入了房颤暴露情况和心房基质程度各异的异质性人群。研究目的是评估电复律(ECV)的急性和长期结果,并确定既往房颤暴露的时间界限,以便在窦性心律(SR)维持几率不同的亚组中对PAF进行重新分类。
521例接受ECV的PAF患者(66%为男性;年龄69±10岁),根据ECV时的房颤持续时间分为四组:A组房颤≤2个月(141例患者);B组房颤>2个月且≤4个月(176例患者);C组房颤>4个月且≤6个月(89例患者);D组房颤>6个月且<1年(115例患者)。
各组急性成功率无差异(分别为98.5%、97.1%、98.9%、96.5%,P = 0.95)。在5年随访时,198例(41%)患者处于SR:A组为50%,B组为44%,C组为42%,D组为25%(P < 0.001)。多变量分析显示,既往ECV(风险比[HR] 1.55,P < 0.001)、左心房扩大(HR 1.39,P = 0.013)以及手术时房颤持续时间>6个月(HR 1.59,P = 0.001)独立预测ECV失败。
ECV具有较高的急性成功率和较低的并发症发生率。长期结果与ECV时的房颤持续时间密切相关:>6个月这一界限有助于选择能从该手术中获益更大的患者。