• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性评估患者满意度,以及外科医生和患者培训师对科洛普 Titan One Touch 释放三件式可充气阴茎假体的评估。

Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.

机构信息

Division of Sexual and Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Med. 2012 Sep;9(9):2467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x
PMID:22759540
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A single-armed, prospective, multicenter international study evaluated the redesigned Coloplast Titan One Touch Release (OTR) pump inflatable penile prosthesis. The OTR pump has a unique release valve that permits deflation of the implant with one squeeze of opposing touch pads.

AIMS

To assess the impact of a new penile prosthesis design, the Titan OTR, on patient ease of operation. Furthermore, to assess patient satisfaction, surgeon acceptance, and the ease with which patients were trained in device operation in the clinic setting.

METHODS

A total of 113 eligible patients from eight centers were recruited from men presenting with erectile dysfunction without prior prosthetic implantation. The subjects had a mean age of 61 years, and had a number of comorbidities, including diabetes (31.9%), hypertension (34.5%), and Peyronie's disease (23.9%). All underwent implantation of the study device.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Questionnaires were used to capture patient satisfaction as well as physician feedback on ease of implantation and patient education. A paired analysis was completed for patient satisfaction at 6 (N = 96) and 12 (N = 90) months.

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction with the device was 90.6% and 90.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. The primary end point, ease of deflation, was seen in 70.8% and 73.3% at these two time points, with the 12-month value statistically better than historical controls. Physicians overwhelmingly reported straightforward/simple intraoperative product preparation (97.3%) and equivalent or easier training compared with their previous pump of choice (96.4%). Adverse events for all subjects (N = 113) included removal of the device in four cases (3.5%) for infection and one case for chronic pain (0.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Titan OTR represents an advance in penile prosthetic technology that is well accepted by patients and physicians. The study design allowed for realistic evaluation of the new technology aimed at enhancing clinical outcomes.

摘要

简介

一项单臂、前瞻性、多中心国际研究评估了重新设计的科洛特 Titan One Touch Release(OTR)泵可膨胀阴茎假体。OTR 泵具有独特的释放阀,只需挤压一对触摸垫即可使植入物放气。

目的

评估新型阴茎假体设计 Titan OTR 对患者操作便利性的影响。此外,评估患者满意度、外科医生接受程度以及患者在临床环境中接受设备操作培训的容易程度。

方法

从 8 个中心招募了 113 名符合条件的男性患者,这些患者因勃起功能障碍就诊且无先前的假体植入。受试者的平均年龄为 61 岁,患有多种合并症,包括糖尿病(31.9%)、高血压(34.5%)和 Peyronie 病(23.9%)。所有患者均植入研究设备。

主要观察指标

使用问卷捕获患者满意度以及医生对植入物容易程度和患者教育的反馈。对 6 个月(N = 96)和 12 个月(N = 90)时的患者满意度进行配对分析。

结果

6 个月和 12 个月时,对设备的总体满意度分别为 90.6%和 90.0%。主要终点,即易于放气,在这两个时间点的分别为 70.8%和 73.3%,12 个月时的数值明显优于历史对照。医生几乎一致报告术中产品准备简单/简单(97.3%),与他们之前选择的泵相比,培训同样容易或更容易(96.4%)。所有受试者(N = 113)的不良事件包括 4 例(3.5%)因感染和 1 例(0.8%)因慢性疼痛而取出设备。

结论

Titan OTR 代表了阴茎假体技术的一项进步,患者和医生都能很好地接受。该研究设计允许对旨在提高临床结果的新技术进行现实评估。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis.前瞻性评估患者满意度,以及外科医生和患者培训师对科洛普 Titan One Touch 释放三件式可充气阴茎假体的评估。
J Sex Med. 2012 Sep;9(9):2467-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
2
Coloplast titan inflatable penile prosthesis with one-touch release pump: review of 100 cases and comparison with genesis pump.康乐保钛制可充式阴茎假体一键释放泵:100 例报告并与创世纪泵比较
J Sex Med. 2011 Jan;8(1):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02064.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
3
Physician and patient satisfaction with the new AMS 700 momentary squeeze inflatable penile prosthesis.医生和患者对新型AMS 700瞬间挤压可膨胀阴茎假体的满意度。
J Sex Med. 2009 Jun;6(6):1773-1778. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01251.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
4
Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.AMS 700™ CX 与科洛普夫™ Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体治疗 Peyronie 病和重塑的比较:临床结果和患者满意度。
J Sex Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):2855-60. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12009. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
5
Satisfaction and complications with the Titan® one-touch release penile implant.Titan®一键释放阴茎假体的满意度与并发症
Scand J Urol. 2014 Feb;48(1):105-9. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.808695. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis.重新设计的两件式阴茎假体的治疗效果及满意度
J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.094.
7
Early experience with the American Medical Systems new tactile pump: results of a multicenter study.美国医疗系统新型触觉泵的早期使用经验:一项多中心研究的结果
J Sex Med. 2005 Mar;2(2):266-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2005.20238.x.
8
Pseudo-malfunction of the Coloplast Titan Inflatable Penile Prosthesis One-Touch Release Pump.康乐保泰坦可膨胀阴茎假体一键释放泵的假性故障
Urology. 2014 Oct;84(4):857-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.012.
9
Long-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titan.患者对不同可膨胀阴茎假体的长期满意度报告:AMS 700CX与柯洛普拉斯泰坦(Coloplast Titan)的比较
Rev Int Androl. 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.androl.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Prospective evaluation of postoperative penile rehabilitation: penile length/girth maintenance 1 year following Coloplast Titan inflatable penile prosthesis.前瞻性评估术后阴茎康复:科洛特 Titan 可膨胀阴茎假体植入术后 1 年的阴茎长度/周长维持情况。
J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1298-304. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12833. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Removal rate and mechanical failure in penile prosthesis implantation: A systematic review.阴茎假体植入的移除率和机械故障:一项系统评价。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01165-9.
2
Advances in activation pumps for three-piece penile prostheses: a narrative review.三件式阴茎假体激活泵的进展:一项叙述性综述
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01130-6.
3
Penile prosthesis implantation: a systematic review of intraoperative and postoperative complications.阴茎假体植入术:术中及术后并发症的系统评价
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01108-4.
4
Economic impact of reduced postoperative visits after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.可膨胀阴茎假体植入术后减少术后随访的经济影响
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Mar;14(3):e240204. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0204. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
5
Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.阴茎假体的最新技术发展:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jan 31;13(1):165-184. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-741. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
6
Defining the incidence and management of postoperative scrotal hematoma after primary and complex three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery.明确初次及复杂三件式可膨胀阴茎假体手术后阴囊血肿的发生率及处理方法。
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jan;37(1):82-86. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00697-2. Epub 2023 May 8.
7
A Unique Case of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) Implantation and Mesh Phalloplasty in a Patient Born with Congenital Fusiform Megalourethra.一例先天性梭形巨尿道患者接受可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)植入及网状阴茎成形术的独特病例。
Res Rep Urol. 2023 Feb 15;15:85-89. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S387042. eCollection 2023.
8
Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.阴茎假体植入技术与手术结果的叙述性综述,包括 transgender 患者。 (注:这里“transgender”可能是特定语境下的表述,一般常用“transgender people”指跨性别者,更准确的表述可结合上下文进一步调整。)
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jun;10(6):2629-2647. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1279.
9
"Pumpology": the Realistic Issues Associated with Pump Placement in Prosthetic Surgery.“泵学”:与假肢手术中泵的放置相关的实际问题。
Curr Urol Rep. 2021 Jan 9;22(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-01027-5.
10
Epidemiology regarding penile prosthetic surgery.阴茎假体手术的流行病学。
Asian J Androl. 2020 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_124_19.