• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故责任与防御性医疗:神经外科医生的全国性调查。

Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusets, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039237. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0039237
PMID:22761745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3382203/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concern over rising healthcare expenditures has led to increased scrutiny of medical practices. As medical liability and malpractice risk rise to crisis levels, the medical-legal environment has contributed to the practice of defensive medicine as practitioners attempt to mitigate liability risk. High-risk specialties, such as neurosurgery, are particularly affected and neurosurgeons have altered their practices to lessen medical-legal risk. We present the first national survey of American neurosurgeons' perceptions of malpractice liability and defensive medicine practices.

METHODS

A validated, 51-question online-survey was sent to 3344 practicing U.S. neurosurgeon members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons, which represents 76% of neurosurgeons in academic and private practices.

RESULTS

A total of 1028 surveys were completed (31% response rate) by neurosurgeons representing diverse sub-specialty practices. Respondents engaged in defensive medicine practices by ordering additional imaging studies (72%), laboratory tests (67%), referring patients to consultants (66%), or prescribing medications (40%). Malpractice premiums were considered a "major or extreme" burden by 64% of respondents which resulted in 45% of respondents eliminating high-risk procedures from their practice due to liability concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Concerns and perceptions about medical liability lead practitioners to practice defensive medicine. As a result, diagnostic testing, consultations and imaging studies are ordered to satisfy a perceived legal risk, resulting in higher healthcare expenditures. To minimize malpractice risk, some neurosurgeons have eliminated high-risk procedures. Left unchecked, concerns over medical liability will further defensive medicine practices, limit patient access to care, and increase the cost of healthcare delivery in the United States.

摘要

背景

对医疗保健支出不断增加的担忧导致对医疗实践的审查越来越严格。随着医疗责任和医疗事故风险上升到危机水平,医疗法律环境导致了防御性医疗的出现,因为医生试图减轻责任风险。高风险专业,如神经外科,尤其受到影响,神经外科医生改变了他们的实践以降低医疗法律风险。我们首次对美国神经外科医生对医疗事故责任和防御性医疗实践的看法进行了全国性调查。

方法

向美国神经外科学会(American Association of Neurological Surgeons)的 3344 名执业美国神经外科医生会员发送了一份经过验证的、有 51 个问题的在线调查,该协会代表了学术和私人执业中的 76%的神经外科医生。

结果

共有 1028 名神经外科医生(31%的回应率)完成了调查,他们代表了各种亚专科实践。调查对象通过开具额外的影像学检查(72%)、实验室检查(67%)、将患者转介给顾问(66%)或开处方(40%)来采取防御性医疗措施。64%的受访者认为医疗事故保险费是“主要或极端”的负担,这导致 45%的受访者因责任问题而从他们的实践中取消高风险手术。

结论

对医疗责任的担忧和看法导致医生采取防御性医疗措施。因此,为了满足感知到的法律风险,进行了诊断性检查、咨询和影像学检查,导致医疗保健支出增加。为了最大限度地降低医疗事故风险,一些神经外科医生已经取消了高风险手术。如果不加控制,对医疗责任的担忧将进一步推动防御性医疗实践,限制患者获得医疗服务的机会,并增加美国医疗保健服务的成本。

相似文献

1
Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons.医疗事故责任与防御性医疗:神经外科医生的全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039237. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
2
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.在不稳定的医疗事故环境中,高风险专科医生的防御性医疗行为。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2609-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609.
3
Defensive Medicine in U.S. Spine Neurosurgery.美国脊柱神经外科中的防御性医疗行为
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Feb;42(3):177-185. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001687.
4
International Defensive Medicine in Neurosurgery: Comparison of Canada, South Africa, and the United States.神经外科领域的国际防御性医疗:加拿大、南非和美国的比较
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.069. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Neurosurgical Defensive Medicine in Texas and Illinois: A Tale of 2 States.德克萨斯州和伊利诺伊州的神经外科防御性医疗:两个州的故事
World Neurosurg. 2016 May;89:112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.080. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
6
Defensive medicine in neurosurgery: does state-level liability risk matter?神经外科中的防御性医疗:州级责任风险重要吗?
Neurosurgery. 2015 Feb;76(2):105-13; discussion 113-4. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000576.
7
Health transformation project and defensive medicine practice among neurosurgeons in Turkey.土耳其神经外科医生的健康转型项目与防御性医疗行为
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e111446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111446. eCollection 2014.
8
Defensive medicine among neurosurgeons in the Netherlands: a national survey.荷兰神经外科医生的防御性医疗行为:一项全国性调查。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Dec;159(12):2341-2350. doi: 10.1007/s00701-017-3323-9. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
Defensive medicine in neurosurgery: the Canadian experience.神经外科中的防御性医疗:加拿大的经验
J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1524-30. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15764. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
10
Impressions of defensive medical practice and medical litigation among South African neurosurgeons.南非神经外科医生对防御性医疗行为和医疗诉讼的看法。
S Afr Med J. 2014 Nov;104(11):736-8. doi: 10.7196/samj.8336.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Technology-Based Simulation among Medical Students as a Global Innovative Solution for Training.医学生中基于技术的模拟作为一种全球创新培训解决方案的应用。
Brain Sci. 2024 Jun 23;14(7):627. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070627.
2
Defensive medicine practices as a result of malpractice claims and workplace physical violence: a cross-sectional study from Egypt.出于医疗事故索赔和工作场所身体暴力的防御性医疗实践:来自埃及的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 16;13(1):22371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47720-6.
3
Medico-legal liability of injuries arising from laryngoscopy.喉内镜检查所致损伤的医事法律责任。
J Laryngol Otol. 2024 May;138(5):554-558. doi: 10.1017/S0022215123001986. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
The practice of defensive medicine among Jordanian physicians: A cross sectional study.约旦医生防御性医疗实践的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 9;18(11):e0289360. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289360. eCollection 2023.
5
Preventing Medicolegal Problems in Neurosurgical Practice: Do's and Don'ts.神经外科学实践中的医疗法律问题预防:注意事项。
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2023;130:221-224. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-12887-6_27.
6
Patient negligence in healthcare systems: Accountability model formulation.医疗系统中的患者疏忽:问责模型的制定。
Health Policy Open. 2021 Mar 1;2:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100037. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Malpractice Litigation Related to Diagnosis and Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms.与颅内动脉瘤的诊断和治疗相关的医疗事故诉讼。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Apr;44(4):460-466. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7828. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
The Assessment of the Rationale for Urgent Head CT-Comparative Analysis of Referrals and Results of Examinations without and with Contrast Enhancement.《有创头颅 CT 检查适应证的评估——对比分析平扫与增强扫描的转诊原因和检查结果》
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Oct 16;58(10):1468. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101468.
9
The occurrence, types, reasons, and mitigation strategies of defensive medicine among physicians: a scoping review.医生防御性医疗的发生、类型、原因和缓解策略:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun 20;22(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08194-w.
10
How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.欧洲医学文献中对防御性医疗的定义:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e057169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between geographic variations and overuse of healthcare services: a systematic review.地理差异与医疗服务过度使用之间的关系:系统评价。
Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):257-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182422b0f.
2
Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem.美国医疗保健服务的过度使用:一个研究不足的问题。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):171-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.772.
3
Malpractice risk according to physician specialty.根据医师专业划分的医疗事故风险。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 18;365(7):629-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370.
4
Malpractice risk and cost are significantly reduced after tort reform.医疗事故险风险和成本在侵权改革后显著降低。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Apr;212(4):463-7, 467.e1-42; discussion 467-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.025.
5
Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.畏惧诉讼对产科护理的影响:一项针对产科实践的全国性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):277-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271213. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
6
How does routine disclosure of medical error affect patients' propensity to sue and their assessment of provider quality? Evidence from survey data.常规披露医疗差错如何影响患者提起诉讼的意愿及其对医疗服务提供者质量的评估?来自调查数据的证据。
Med Care. 2010 Nov;48(11):955-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eaf84d.
7
National costs of the medical liability system.医疗责任制度的国家成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1569-77. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0807.
8
An epidemiologic study of closed emergency department malpractice claims in a national database of physician malpractice insurers.一项在医师职业责任保险公司全国数据库中进行的封闭急诊室医疗事故索赔的流行病学研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):553-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00729.x.
9
Tort reform: alternative models.侵权法改革:替代模式。
Clin Neurosurg. 2008;55:121-5.
10
How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit.医生在经历医疗诉讼前后对前列腺癌筛查的态度。
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):120-5.