• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建立腹部超声在分娩第二阶段定义胎儿头位的准确性和可接受性:一项验证研究。

Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study.

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin & Coombe Women & Infant's University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Sep;164(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001
PMID:22762840
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnosis of the foetal head position in the second stage of labour by ultrasound scan performed by a novice sonographer and by clinical assessment, to that of an expert sonographer (gold standard); and to evaluate the acceptability of ultrasound in the second stage of labour to women and clinicians.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a case series. We recruited sixty women delivering in a university hospital in Dublin, Ireland. An abdominal scan was performed by a novice and an expert ultrasonographer and a clinical assessment was performed by an obstetrician or midwife. Each assessor was blinded to the findings of the others. The main outcome measures were errors in the diagnosis of the foetal head position and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labour.

RESULTS

The ultrasound findings of the novice and expert ultrasonographers were consistent in 52 (87%) cases for the foetal head position; 80% accuracy for the first ten scans performed by the novice (median time 150 s) and 90% for the last ten scans (median time 10s). The novice made no occipito-anterior/occipito-posterior (OA/OP) errors. The clinical diagnosis of the foetal head position was incorrect in 25 (42%) cases; 8 (13%) OA/OP errors. Women and clinicians did not consider the ultrasound assessment to be intrusive.

CONCLUSION

An abdominal scan by a novice ultrasonographer is an accurate and acceptable method of diagnosing the foetal head position in the second stage of labour and may have a role to play in assessment prior to instrumental delivery.

摘要

目的

比较新手和专家超声医师对第二产程胎头位置的诊断与专家超声诊断(金标准)的差异,并评估第二产程中超声检查在产妇和临床医生中的接受程度。

设计

病例系列研究。我们招募了在爱尔兰都柏林一所大学医院分娩的 60 名女性。由新手和专家超声医师进行腹部超声检查,由产科医生或助产士进行临床评估。每位评估者均对其他评估者的结果不知情。主要结局指标是胎头位置诊断错误和第二产程中腹部超声检查的可接受性。

结果

新手和专家超声医师的超声检查结果在 52 例(87%)胎头位置中一致;新手前 10 次扫描的准确率为 80%(中位数时间为 150 秒),最后 10 次扫描的准确率为 90%(中位数时间为 10 秒)。新手未出现枕前位/枕后位(OA/OP)错误。临床诊断胎头位置错误的有 25 例(42%);8 例 OA/OP 错误。产妇和临床医生认为超声评估无侵入性。

结论

新手超声医师的腹部超声检查是一种准确且可接受的第二产程胎头位置诊断方法,在器械分娩前评估中可能具有一定作用。

相似文献

1
Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study.建立腹部超声在分娩第二阶段定义胎儿头位的准确性和可接受性:一项验证研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Sep;164(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较了超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理对预防器械分娩并发症的效果。
BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12810. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
3
Sonographic assessment of fetal spine and head position during the first and second stages of labor for the diagnosis of persistent occiput posterior position: a pilot study.超声评估产程第一、二阶段胎儿脊柱和头部位置用于持续性枕后位的诊断:一项初步研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;35(2):210-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.7504.
4
Does ultrasonographic foetal head position prior to induction of labour predict the outcome of delivery?超声胎儿头位在分娩诱导前是否能预测分娩结局?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Oct;164(2):133-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
5
Sonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at delivery.胎儿头部下降的超声图像模式:与第二产程活跃期时长及分娩时枕部位置的关系
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):82-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.13324. Epub 2014 May 28.
6
Prospective multicenter study of ultrasound-based measurements of fetal head station and position throughout labor.前瞻性多中心研究:分娩过程中基于超声的胎儿胎头位置和胎位测量。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):611-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.14821.
7
Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?经会阴超声成像在胎头先露的第二产程延长中的应用:“进展角度”能多好地预测分娩方式?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):326-30. doi: 10.1002/uog.6294.
8
Novel artificial intelligence approach for automatic differentiation of fetal occiput anterior and non-occiput anterior positions during labor.一种新的人工智能方法,用于在分娩期间自动区分胎儿枕前位和非枕前位。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):93-99. doi: 10.1002/uog.23739.
9
Strategies to enhance assessment of the fetal head position before instrumental delivery: a survey of obstetric practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.在器械分娩前增强胎儿头部位置评估的策略:英国和爱尔兰产科实践调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Dec;165(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
10
Impact of intrapartal ultrasound to assess fetal head position and station on the type of obstetrical interventions at full cervical dilatation.产时超声评估胎头位置及先露高低对宫颈完全扩张时产科干预类型的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 May;25(5):484-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.587057. Epub 2011 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Intrapartum Ultrasonography Improve the Placement of the Vacuum Cup in Operative Vaginal Deliveries?产时超声检查能否改善真空吸引器在经阴道分娩中的放置位置?
Tomography. 2023 Jan 27;9(1):247-254. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010019.
2
Midwives' views on the acceptability of a future trial of the Sims posture for fetal malposition in labor in the context of their knowledge and practice: A mixed-methods study.在了解和实践背景下,助产士对未来关于分娩时胎儿胎位异常采用西姆斯体位试验可接受性的看法:一项混合方法研究
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Aug 1;6:50. doi: 10.18332/ejm/150377. eCollection 2022.
3
Sonographic Evaluation of the Mechanism of Active Labor (SonoLabor Study): observational study protocol regarding the implementation of the sonopartogram.
超声评估活跃分娩机制(SonoLabor 研究):关于实施声动力图的观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e047188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047188.
4
Acceptability of Intrapartum Ultrasound Monitoring - Experience from a Romanian Longitudinal Study.产时超声监测的可接受性——来自罗马尼亚一项纵向研究的经验
Curr Health Sci J. 2015 Oct-Dec;41(4):355-360. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.41.04.10. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
5
Benefits and pitfalls of the use of intrapartum ultrasound.产时超声使用的益处与陷阱
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2015 May;18(2):53-59. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2015.tb00042.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
6
Maternal positioning to correct occipito-posterior fetal position in labour: a randomised controlled trial.分娩时产妇体位纠正枕后位胎儿姿势:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 24;14:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-83.
7
Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.研究方案。IDUS-器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理作为预防器械分娩并发症的方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-95.