Suppr超能文献

建立腹部超声在分娩第二阶段定义胎儿头位的准确性和可接受性:一项验证研究。

Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study.

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin & Coombe Women & Infant's University Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Sep;164(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnosis of the foetal head position in the second stage of labour by ultrasound scan performed by a novice sonographer and by clinical assessment, to that of an expert sonographer (gold standard); and to evaluate the acceptability of ultrasound in the second stage of labour to women and clinicians.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a case series. We recruited sixty women delivering in a university hospital in Dublin, Ireland. An abdominal scan was performed by a novice and an expert ultrasonographer and a clinical assessment was performed by an obstetrician or midwife. Each assessor was blinded to the findings of the others. The main outcome measures were errors in the diagnosis of the foetal head position and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound in the second stage of labour.

RESULTS

The ultrasound findings of the novice and expert ultrasonographers were consistent in 52 (87%) cases for the foetal head position; 80% accuracy for the first ten scans performed by the novice (median time 150 s) and 90% for the last ten scans (median time 10s). The novice made no occipito-anterior/occipito-posterior (OA/OP) errors. The clinical diagnosis of the foetal head position was incorrect in 25 (42%) cases; 8 (13%) OA/OP errors. Women and clinicians did not consider the ultrasound assessment to be intrusive.

CONCLUSION

An abdominal scan by a novice ultrasonographer is an accurate and acceptable method of diagnosing the foetal head position in the second stage of labour and may have a role to play in assessment prior to instrumental delivery.

摘要

目的

比较新手和专家超声医师对第二产程胎头位置的诊断与专家超声诊断(金标准)的差异,并评估第二产程中超声检查在产妇和临床医生中的接受程度。

设计

病例系列研究。我们招募了在爱尔兰都柏林一所大学医院分娩的 60 名女性。由新手和专家超声医师进行腹部超声检查,由产科医生或助产士进行临床评估。每位评估者均对其他评估者的结果不知情。主要结局指标是胎头位置诊断错误和第二产程中腹部超声检查的可接受性。

结果

新手和专家超声医师的超声检查结果在 52 例(87%)胎头位置中一致;新手前 10 次扫描的准确率为 80%(中位数时间为 150 秒),最后 10 次扫描的准确率为 90%(中位数时间为 10 秒)。新手未出现枕前位/枕后位(OA/OP)错误。临床诊断胎头位置错误的有 25 例(42%);8 例 OA/OP 错误。产妇和临床医生认为超声评估无侵入性。

结论

新手超声医师的腹部超声检查是一种准确且可接受的第二产程胎头位置诊断方法,在器械分娩前评估中可能具有一定作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验