• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究方案。IDUS-器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理作为预防器械分娩并发症的方法。

Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.

机构信息

Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin & Coombe Women & Infant's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-95.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-95
PMID:22970933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3490917/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Instrumental deliveries are commonly performed in the United Kingdom and Ireland, with rates of 12 - 17% in most centres. Knowing the exact position of the fetal head is a pre-requisite for safe instrumental delivery. Traditionally, diagnosis of the fetal head position is made on transvaginal digital examination by delineating the suture lines of the fetal skull and the fontanelles. However, the accuracy of transvaginal digital examination can be unreliable and varies between 20% and 75%. Failure to identify the correct fetal head position increases the likelihood of failed instrumental delivery with the additional morbidity of sequential use of instruments or second stage caesarean section. The use of ultrasound in determining the position of the fetal head has been explored but is not part of routine clinical practice.

METHODS/DESIGN: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial is proposed. The study will take place in two large maternity units in Ireland with a combined annual birth rate of 13,500 deliveries. It will involve 450 nulliparous women undergoing instrumental delivery after 37 weeks gestation. The main outcome measure will be incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position. A study involving 450 women will have 80% power to detect a 10% difference in the incidence of inaccurate diagnosis of the fetal head position with two-sided 5% alpha.

DISCUSSION

It is both important and timely to evaluate the use of ultrasound to diagnose the fetal head position prior to instrumental delivery before routine use can be advocated. The overall aim is to reduce the incidence of incorrect diagnosis of the fetal head position prior to instrumental delivery and improve the safety of instrumental deliveries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN72230496.

摘要

背景

在英国和爱尔兰,器械分娩较为常见,大多数中心的比例为 12-17%。准确了解胎儿头部的位置是安全进行器械分娩的前提。传统上,通过描绘胎儿颅骨的缝线和囟门来进行经阴道数字检查,以诊断胎儿头部的位置。然而,经阴道数字检查的准确性可能不可靠,其准确率在 20%至 75%之间变化。如果无法识别正确的胎儿头部位置,器械分娩失败的可能性会增加,并且可能需要连续使用器械或行第二产程剖宫产,从而增加额外的发病率。已经探索了在确定胎儿头部位置时使用超声的方法,但它不是常规临床实践的一部分。

方法/设计:提出了一项多中心随机对照试验。该研究将在爱尔兰的两个大型产科单位进行,这两个单位的合并年分娩率为 13500 例。将涉及 450 名经阴道分娩的初产妇,这些产妇在 37 周妊娠后进行器械分娩。主要结局指标将是胎儿头部位置的不正确诊断。涉及 450 名妇女的研究将有 80%的效力来检测出胎儿头部位置不正确诊断的发生率差异为 10%,双侧 5%的α值。

讨论

在提倡常规使用之前,评估在器械分娩前使用超声诊断胎儿头部位置非常重要且及时。总体目标是减少器械分娩前胎儿头部位置不正确诊断的发生率,提高器械分娩的安全性。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN72230496。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e47/3490917/d81a41b1ffbd/1471-2393-12-95-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e47/3490917/f0bdd47a913b/1471-2393-12-95-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e47/3490917/d81a41b1ffbd/1471-2393-12-95-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e47/3490917/f0bdd47a913b/1471-2393-12-95-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e47/3490917/d81a41b1ffbd/1471-2393-12-95-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol. IDUS - Instrumental delivery & ultrasound: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.研究方案。IDUS-器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理作为预防器械分娩并发症的方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-95.
2
Instrumental delivery and ultrasound : a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery.器械分娩与超声:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较了超声评估胎儿头部位置与标准护理对预防器械分娩并发症的效果。
BJOG. 2014 Jul;121(8):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12810. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
3
Strategies to enhance assessment of the fetal head position before instrumental delivery: a survey of obstetric practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.在器械分娩前增强胎儿头部位置评估的策略:英国和爱尔兰产科实践调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Dec;165(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
4
Randomised Italian Sonography for occiput POSition Trial Ante vacuum (R.I.S.POS.T.A.).随机意大利超声检查胎儿枕骨后位试验前真空法(R.I.S.P.O.S.T.A.)。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;52(6):699-705. doi: 10.1002/uog.19091. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
5
Ultrasound vs routine care before instrumental vaginal delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.超声检查与器械性阴道分娩前常规护理的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):1941-1948. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14236. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
6
Influence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trial.超声判断胎头位置对分娩方式的影响:一项实用随机试验。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;46(5):520-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.14785. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置II:第二产程中经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x.
8
Comparison of transvaginal digital examination with intrapartum sonography to determine fetal head position before instrumental delivery.经阴道指检与产时超声检查在器械助产分娩前确定胎儿头部位置的比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;21(5):437-40. doi: 10.1002/uog.103.
9
Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study.超声评估初产妇胎儿下降情况:一项纵向研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):378.e1-378.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
Intrapartum fetal head position I: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the active stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置I:活跃期经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):258-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00641.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Sonographic Evaluation of the Mechanism of Active Labor (SonoLabor Study): observational study protocol regarding the implementation of the sonopartogram.超声评估活跃分娩机制(SonoLabor 研究):关于实施声动力图的观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 7;11(9):e047188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047188.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies to enhance assessment of the fetal head position before instrumental delivery: a survey of obstetric practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland.在器械分娩前增强胎儿头部位置评估的策略:英国和爱尔兰产科实践调查。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Dec;165(2):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.07.029. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
2
Establishing the accuracy and acceptability of abdominal ultrasound to define the foetal head position in the second stage of labour: a validation study.建立腹部超声在分娩第二阶段定义胎儿头位的准确性和可接受性:一项验证研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Sep;164(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
3
A randomised controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicentre pilot study.
经阴道手术分娩时常规与限制性使用会阴切开术的随机对照试验:一项多中心试点研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1695-702; discussion 1702-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01960.x.
4
A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.一项关于手术阴道分娩时会阴切开术的使用与母婴发病率关系的前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2008 Dec;115(13):1688-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01961.x.
5
Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?对失败的恐惧:我们在产房进行的器械助产操作是否过多?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(11):1234-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802443848.
6
Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births.产房器械助产与预期困难助产时立即剖宫产的对比试验
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD005545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005545.pub2.
7
Comparison of the learning curves of digital examination and transabdominal sonography for the determination of fetal head position during labor.分娩期间数字检查与经腹超声检查确定胎儿头部位置的学习曲线比较。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;31(3):332-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.5267.
8
Predictors of failed operative vaginal delivery: a single-center experience.手术阴道分娩失败的预测因素:单中心经验
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;197(3):308.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.051.
9
Transabdominal ultrasound assessment of the fetal head and the accuracy of vacuum cup application.经腹超声对胎儿头部的评估及真空吸引杯应用的准确性
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Aug;98(2):120-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Jun 22.
10
Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: A retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001.持续性枕后位的相关因素及结局:一项1976年至2001年的回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2006 Sep;19(9):563-8. doi: 10.1080/14767050600682487.