Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Environ Pollut. 2012 Nov;170:39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
Pre-requisite for reliable O(3) risk assessment for plants is determination of stomatal O(3) uptake. One unaddressed uncertainty in this context relates to transpiration-induced molecular collisions impeding stomatal O(3) influx. This study quantifies, through physical modelling, the error made when estimating stomatal O(3) flux without accounting for molecular collisions arising from transpiratory mass flow of gas out of the leaf. The analysis demonstrates that the error increases with increasing leaf-to-air water vapour mole fraction difference (Δw), being zero in water vapour saturated air and 4.2% overestimation at Δw of 0.05. Overestimation is approximately twice as large in empirical studies quantifying stomatal O(3) flux from measured leaf or canopy water flux, if neglecting both water vapour-dry air collisions (causing overestimation of leaf conductance) and collisions involving O(3). Correction for transpiration-induced molecular collisions is thus relevant for both empirical research and for large-scale modelling of stomatal O(3) flux across strong spatial Δw gradients.
可靠的 O(3) 风险评估的前提条件是确定气孔 O(3) 吸收。在这方面,一个未解决的不确定性与蒸腾引起的分子碰撞阻碍气孔 O(3)流入有关。本研究通过物理建模,量化了在不考虑因气体从叶片逸出而引起的蒸腾质流引起的分子碰撞的情况下,估算气孔 O(3)通量时所产生的误差。分析表明,误差随着叶片与空气之间水蒸气分压差(Δw)的增加而增加,在水蒸气饱和空气中为零,在Δw 为 0.05 时高估了 4.2%。如果忽略水蒸气-干燥空气碰撞(导致叶片导度高估)和涉及 O(3)的碰撞,那么在从测量的叶片或冠层水通量量化气孔 O(3)通量的实证研究中,高估的程度大约是两倍。因此,对于蒸腾引起的分子碰撞的校正对于经验研究和跨强空间Δw 梯度的气孔 O(3)通量的大尺度建模都是相关的。