Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Drug Saf. 2012 Aug 1;35(8):623-8. doi: 10.2165/11630650-000000000-00000.
While the US FDA maintains a voluntary reporting system, postmarketing adverse drug events (ADEs) are underreported, and this case report-based system does not allow accurate determination of incidence.
The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of an automated phone pharmacovigilance system for ambulatory patients by comparing systematically collected, patient-reported symptoms to reflect possible ADEs with those reported on the package inserts of two drugs with postmarketing safety concerns, varenicline and zolpidem.
English-speaking adults who received a prescription for zolpidem (n = 370) or varenicline (n = 107) from a primary care physician at one of 11 participating clinics, and who participated in the pharmacovigilance system during 2008-2010, were included in the study. Patients were called approximately 4 weeks following their visit and asked to complete a standard script that asked about adherence and pre-specified symptoms.
The main outcome measures were elicited rates of pre-specified symptoms or possible ADEs.
Compared with the package insert, patients taking zolpidem were significantly (p < 0.001) more likely to report fatigue (9.0% vs 1.0%), itching (4.5% vs 1.0%) and muscle aches (5.6% vs 1.0%). Elicited rates of depression and hallucination were similar to those reported in the package insert. Patients taking varenicline were significantly more likely to report confusion (1.7% vs 0.1%), depression (3.4% vs 0.1%), fatigue (6.0% vs 1.0%), hallucinations (1.7% vs 0.1%), muscle aches (6.0% vs 1.0%) and sexual dysfunction (4.3% vs 0.1%).
Automated phone pharmacovigilance can provide estimates of possible ADEs in clinical practice. In the case of varenicline, these data support some of the safety concerns that have come to light postmarketing, while others such as depression and hallucination related to zolpidem were not detected. These data highlight the potential value of, and innovative ways of collecting, information about possible ADEs directly from patients.
尽管美国 FDA 维持着一个自愿报告系统,但上市后药物不良反应 (ADE) 的报告仍不充分,而这种基于病例报告的系统无法准确确定发病率。
本研究旨在通过比较系统收集的、患者报告的症状与两种具有上市后安全问题的药物(伐伦克林和唑吡坦)的说明书中报告的症状,评估自动电话药物警戒系统对门诊患者的有效性。
本研究纳入了 2008 年至 2010 年期间在 11 家参与诊所之一由初级保健医生开出唑吡坦(n = 370)或伐伦克林(n = 107)处方的讲英语的成年患者,且患者参与了药物警戒系统。大约在就诊后 4 周时,患者会被电话随访,并被要求完成一个标准脚本,询问其用药依从性和特定症状。
主要观察指标是特定症状或可能的 ADE 的发生率。
与说明书相比,服用唑吡坦的患者出现疲劳(9.0%比 1.0%)、瘙痒(4.5%比 1.0%)和肌肉疼痛(5.6%比 1.0%)的比例显著更高(p < 0.001)。抑郁和幻觉的发生率与说明书中报告的相似。服用伐伦克林的患者出现困惑(1.7%比 0.1%)、抑郁(3.4%比 0.1%)、疲劳(6.0%比 1.0%)、幻觉(1.7%比 0.1%)、肌肉疼痛(6.0%比 1.0%)和性功能障碍(4.3%比 0.1%)的比例显著更高。
自动电话药物警戒系统可以提供临床实践中可能的 ADE 发生率的估计。在伐伦克林的情况下,这些数据支持了一些上市后出现的安全问题,但唑吡坦的抑郁和幻觉等其他问题则没有被检测到。这些数据突出了直接从患者那里收集可能的 ADE 信息的潜在价值和创新方法。