Department of Family Social Science, University of Minnesota, 290 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2012 Jun;38 Suppl 1:92-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00309.x. Epub 2012 May 15.
The purpose of this study is to address how the consulting approaches of family therapists working with family businesses differ from those of business consultants. The logic of analytic induction was used to analyze qualitative data from family business consultants with and without training in family therapy. Consultants were asked to respond to two vignettes: one emphasized primarily family system problems, whereas the other emphasized business problems with influencing issues at the family/business intersection. Both similarities and differences were found in reference to problem assessment, consulting goal orientation, intervention strategy focus, consultant role and function, and consulting setting preference between consultants with and without family therapy training. Results indicate that consultants of each discipline provide a unique perspective and expertise that allow them to successfully address the spectrum of issues that family firms face. Further, findings highlight the unique contribution of family therapists to an interdisciplinary consulting team.
本研究旨在探讨与家族企业合作的家庭治疗师的咨询方法与商业顾问的咨询方法有何不同。采用分析归纳法对接受过家庭治疗培训和未接受过家庭治疗培训的家族企业顾问的定性数据进行分析。顾问被要求对两个情景案例做出回应：一个主要强调家庭系统问题，另一个则强调在家庭/企业交叉点有影响的业务问题。在案例问题评估、咨询目标导向、干预策略重点、顾问角色和职能以及有和没有家庭治疗培训的顾问对咨询环境的偏好等方面，都发现了相似点和不同点。结果表明，每个学科的顾问都提供了独特的视角和专业知识，使他们能够成功地解决家族企业面临的一系列问题。此外，研究结果还强调了家庭治疗师在跨学科咨询团队中的独特贡献。
