Hambleton Victoria Lerma, Gómez Ignacio Arribas, Andreu Francisco A Bernabeu
Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;40(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
Our aim was to evaluate the equivalence between analytic parameters from blood samples obtained from a saline solution lock device used for the infusion of drugs and those from venipuncture. In our emergency department, patients bearing a saline solution lock device have blood extracted by venipuncture to avoid possible contamination of the sample.
Adults from the emergency department with a saline solution lock device who required laboratory tests were selected as candidates for this cross-sectional observational study. Infusions were halted and flushed with 0.9% saline solution; 2 minutes later, 2 mL of blood was drawn and discarded, and the corresponding laboratory tubes were filled. Immediately after, another sample was withdrawn from the opposite extremity by venipuncture. Both samples were analyzed for hematology, biochemistry, venous blood gases, and coagulation parameters. Concordance was evaluated by use of the intraclass correlation coefficient with its 95% confidence intervals; Bland-Altman plots were used to illustrate the percentage of samples with differences exceeding 2 SDs. The mean differences were also checked to detect those exceeding the laboratory's systematic error.
An intraclass correlation coefficient of over 0.9 was achieved for all parameters except for pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and partial pressure of oxygen. Differences of over 2 SDs were found in fewer than 10% of all parameters. None of them exceeded 3 SDs, except for pH and venous blood gases. All parameters showed differences below the laboratory's accepted systematic error except for pH and venous blood gases.
Blood samples extracted from a peripheral catheter with or without drug infusions are valid for the analysis of hematology, biochemistry, and coagulation parameters but not for venous blood gases. Nurses should know the benefits of using an existing peripheral catheter for drawing blood samples for laboratory analysis even when infusing commonly used drugs. Emergency nurses should consider collecting blood specimens from a venous access device regardless of the type of drug infusions administered, because it is a safe, simple, and fast technique, which is time efficient when treating patients with limited venous access sites. This procedure reduces patient discomfort and the risk of complications related to venipunctures.
我们的目的是评估从用于药物输注的生理盐水锁装置采集的血样与静脉穿刺采集的血样在分析参数上的等效性。在我们的急诊科,带有生理盐水锁装置的患者通过静脉穿刺采血,以避免样本可能受到污染。
选择急诊科中带有生理盐水锁装置且需要进行实验室检查的成年患者作为这项横断面观察性研究的对象。停止输液并用0.9%生理盐水冲洗;2分钟后,抽取2 mL血液并弃去,然后将相应的实验室试管装满。随后立即从对侧肢体通过静脉穿刺采集另一份样本。对两份样本进行血液学、生物化学、静脉血气和凝血参数分析。使用组内相关系数及其95%置信区间评估一致性;采用Bland-Altman图来说明差异超过2个标准差的样本百分比。还检查了平均差异,以检测那些超过实验室系统误差的差异。
除pH值、二氧化碳分压和氧分压外,所有参数的组内相关系数均超过0.9。在所有参数中,差异超过2个标准差的参数不到10%。除pH值和静脉血气外,没有一个参数超过3个标准差。除pH值和静脉血气外,所有参数的差异均低于实验室认可的系统误差。
无论是否进行药物输注,从外周导管采集的血样对于血液学、生物化学和凝血参数的分析都是有效的,但对于静脉血气分析无效。护士应了解即使在输注常用药物时,使用现有的外周导管采集血样进行实验室分析的益处。急诊护士应考虑从静脉通路装置采集血标本,无论所输注药物的类型如何,因为这是一种安全、简单且快速的技术,在治疗静脉通路部位有限的患者时具有时间效率。该操作可减轻患者不适以及与静脉穿刺相关的并发症风险。