• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周静脉导管采集血标本的可靠性。

Reliability of blood tests taken from the peripheral intravenous catheter.

机构信息

Internal Medicine Division, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Division of Biochemistry Laboratory, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 15;101(28):e29268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029268.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000029268
PMID:35839005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11132390/
Abstract

We aimed to compare the reliability of laboratory blood tests using 2 sampling methods, via a peripheral venous catheter (PVC) vs direct venipuncture stab (DVS), we evaluated the effect of time elapsed since PVC insertion, PVC diameter, and administration of saline and/or antibiotic infusion through PVC on the blood test results. A prospective comparative study was conducted between May 2018 and July 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years and admitted to our department with a 20G/22G PVC inserted within the last 24 hours were enrolled. Blood samples were collected from each participant in the morning, and a second sample was drawn using PVC. Dependent variables included the percentage of hemolysis, failure rate, complete blood count, biochemical testing parameters, and coagulation functions. A total of 211 patients participated in the study. In total, 237 blood tests were conducted, of which 167 were performed on day 1 and the remaining on day 2, with a second blood sample collected from 26 patients on day 2. Twenty-one participants received 22G PVC, and 23 participants received active infusion. No significant differences were found in failure rates when each subgroup was compared with the primary day 1 group. The intraclass correlation coefficient indicated significant correlations among all the indices in all groups. Both blood sampling methods (PVC and direct venipuncture) can be used interchangeably for routine laboratory tests on days 1 and 2 after PVC insertion using 20G/22G PVC or infused PVC.

摘要

我们旨在比较两种采血方法(外周静脉导管[PVC]与直接静脉穿刺刺)的实验室血液检测可靠性,评估从 PVC 插入到采血的时间间隔、PVC 直径、以及通过 PVC 给予生理盐水和/或抗生素输液对血液检测结果的影响。2018 年 5 月至 2019 年 7 月进行了一项前瞻性比较研究。入选标准为年龄≥18 岁、在过去 24 小时内插入 20G/22G PVC 的我院住院患者。每位患者清晨采集血样,然后使用 PVC 采集第二份样本。主要观察指标包括溶血百分比、失败率、全血细胞计数、生化检测参数和凝血功能。共 211 例患者参与了该研究。共进行了 237 次血液检测,其中 167 次在第 1 天进行,其余在第 2 天进行,第 2 天从 26 例患者中采集第二份血样。21 例患者接受了 22G PVC,23 例患者接受了活性输注。与主要第 1 天组相比,每个亚组的失败率无显著差异。组内相关系数表明,所有组的所有指标之间均存在显著相关性。在第 1 天和第 2 天,使用 20G/22G PVC 或输注 PVC 后,两种采血方法(PVC 和直接静脉穿刺)均可互换用于常规实验室检查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/409e/11132390/8f01a6d5b086/medi-101-e29268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/409e/11132390/8f01a6d5b086/medi-101-e29268-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/409e/11132390/8f01a6d5b086/medi-101-e29268-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability of blood tests taken from the peripheral intravenous catheter.外周静脉导管采集血标本的可靠性。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 15;101(28):e29268. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029268.
2
Venipuncture versus peripheral catheter: do infusions alter laboratory results?静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管:输液会改变实验室检查结果吗?
J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;40(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
3
A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter.一项比较两种采血方法的横断面研究:直接静脉穿刺和外周静脉导管采血。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 27;4(2):e004250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250.
4
Blood sampling from peripherally inserted central catheter is effective and safe for patients with head and neck cancers.经外周静脉置入的中心静脉导管采血对头颈部癌症患者有效且安全。
J Vasc Access. 2021 May;22(3):424-431. doi: 10.1177/1129729820943458. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
5
Blood sampling through peripheral venous catheters is reliable for selected basic analytes in children.经外周静脉留置导管采集血样,适用于采集儿童部分基础检测指标。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e179-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2920. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
6
Risk factors for peripheral venous catheter failure: A prospective cohort study of 5345 patients.外周静脉导管失败的危险因素:5345 例患者的前瞻性队列研究。
J Vasc Access. 2022 Nov;23(6):911-921. doi: 10.1177/11297298211015035. Epub 2021 May 13.
7
Comparison of two blood sampling methods in anticoagulation therapy: venipuncture and peripheral venous catheter.抗凝治疗中两种采血方法的比较:静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管采血。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01858.x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
8
A comparison of hemolysis rates using intravenous catheters versus venipuncture tubes for obtaining blood samples.使用静脉留置针与静脉穿刺管获取血样时溶血率的比较。
J Emerg Nurs. 1996 Dec;22(6):566-9. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(96)80213-3.
9
Comparison of Routine Replacement With Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters.外周静脉留置针常规更换与临床指征更换的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Nov 1;181(11):1471-1478. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5345.
10
Expert versus generalist inserters for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion: a pilot randomised controlled trial.外周静脉导管插入术的专家与多面手操作者:一项初步随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Oct 17;19(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2946-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral intravenous infusion for children based on computer digital video technology.基于计算机数字视频技术的儿童外周静脉输液
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jan 15;15(1):466-475. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Blood sampled from existing peripheral IV cannulae yields results equivalent to venepuncture: a systematic review.从现有外周静脉留置针采集的血液样本产生的结果与静脉穿刺相当:一项系统评价。
JRSM Open. 2020 May 6;11(5):2054270419894817. doi: 10.1177/2054270419894817. eCollection 2020 May.
2
Blood Samples of Peripheral Venous Catheter or The Usual Way: Do Infusion Fluid Alters the Biochemical Test Results?外周静脉导管采集的血样还是常规方式:输液会改变生化检测结果吗?
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Nov 3;8(7):93-9. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n7p93.
3
Blood collection from intravenous lines: is one drawing site better than others?
从静脉管路采血:一个采血部位会比其他部位更好吗?
Lab Med. 2014 Spring;45(2):172-5. doi: 10.1309/lm2xcv5sqml1ontm.
4
A cross-sectional study to compare two blood collection methods: direct venous puncture and peripheral venous catheter.一项比较两种采血方法的横断面研究:直接静脉穿刺和外周静脉导管采血。
BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 27;4(2):e004250. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004250.
5
Critical review and meta-analysis of spurious hemolysis in blood samples collected from intravenous catheters.静脉留置导管采集血标本中假性溶血的批判性评价和荟萃分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013;23(2):193-200. doi: 10.11613/bm.2013.022.
6
Low vacuum and discard tubes reduce hemolysis in samples drawn from intravenous catheters.低真空采血管和丢弃式采血管可减少从静脉导管采集的样本中的溶血。
Clin Biochem. 2013 Aug;46(12):1142-1144. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
7
Venipuncture versus peripheral catheter: do infusions alter laboratory results?静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管:输液会改变实验室检查结果吗?
J Emerg Nurs. 2014 Jan;40(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
8
Blood sampling through peripheral venous catheters is reliable for selected basic analytes in children.经外周静脉留置导管采集血样,适用于采集儿童部分基础检测指标。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e179-86. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2920. Epub 2010 Jun 21.
9
Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rates in an emergency department: analysis of venipuncture versus intravenous catheter collection techniques.急诊科护理血标本采集技术与溶血率:静脉穿刺与静脉留置针采集技术的分析
J Emerg Nurs. 2008 Feb;34(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
10
Comparison of two blood sampling methods in anticoagulation therapy: venipuncture and peripheral venous catheter.抗凝治疗中两种采血方法的比较:静脉穿刺与外周静脉导管采血。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(3):386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01858.x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.