Hirata K, Lehmann D
Department of Neurology, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
Int J Psychophysiol. 1990 Oct;9(3):293-301. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(90)90061-h.
The effects of serial order of the stimuli on event-related potentials (ERPs) in an auditory oddball paradigm with 700 ms ISI were studied in 19 normals, recording from Fz, Cz, Pz and combined ears. N1 and P2 to the last preceding frequent stimulus, the rare (attended target) stimulus, and the following two frequent stimuli were evaluated using 6 reference-independent measures: latency (time of maximal potential range between any two locations), amplitude of maximal potential range, global field power, vertex (Cz) current source density, location of extreme potential, and location of potential centroid. Exploratory statistics were used to determine differences of interest. Eighteen of the 36 comparisons for N1, and 4 of the 36 comparisons for P2 showed double-ended P-values of less than 5%, 6 times the overall incidence expected by chance. For the ERP evoked 1400-ms post-target, global field power and location of N1, and latency and location of P2 still differed from pre-target ERP values. This suggests a new and temporarily persisting change of brain state following the target stimulus. The first 3 measures showed 'undershoot' below pre-target levels, contradicting a simple 're-habituation' model. All 6 measures of N1, as well as latency and location of P2 increased or anteriorized for the attended target; the location changes indicate that processing the attended target activates additional neural processes, and does not only increase the activation of the same neural processes which operate on frequent stimuli.
在19名正常人中,研究了在刺激间隔为700毫秒的听觉oddball范式中,刺激的序列顺序对事件相关电位(ERP)的影响,记录电极置于Fz、Cz、Pz以及双耳。使用6种与参考无关的测量方法评估了对前一个频繁刺激、罕见(被关注的目标)刺激以及随后两个频繁刺激的N1和P2:潜伏期(任意两个位置之间最大电位范围的时间)、最大电位范围的幅度、全局场功率、顶点(Cz)电流源密度、极端电位的位置以及电位质心的位置。采用探索性统计方法确定感兴趣的差异。N1的36次比较中有18次,P2的36次比较中有4次显示双侧P值小于5%,是偶然预期总体发生率的6倍。对于目标刺激后1400毫秒诱发的ERP,全局场功率和N1的位置,以及P2的潜伏期和位置仍与目标刺激前的ERP值不同。这表明目标刺激后大脑状态出现了一种新的且暂时持续的变化。前3项测量显示低于目标刺激前水平的“下冲”,这与简单的“重新习惯化”模型相矛盾。N1的所有6项测量指标,以及P2的潜伏期和位置,对于被关注的目标都增加或前移;位置变化表明,处理被关注的目标激活了额外的神经过程,而不仅仅是增加了对频繁刺激起作用的相同神经过程的激活。