Suppr超能文献

健康成年人听觉事件相关电位潜伏期和振幅的即刻和短期重测效应。

The effects of immediate and short-term retest on the latencies and amplitudes of the auditory event-related potentials in healthy adults.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

出版信息

J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Jan 30;186(1):77-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.10.013. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the immediate and short-term effects of repeated within session trials on N1, P2, N2 and P3 latencies and P2, N2 and P3 amplitudes in healthy adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ERPs were elicited by the auditory oddball paradigm and recorded over Fz, Cz and Pz in 18 healthy adults over two sessions, one to three days apart, and two within session trials with one to three minutes trial-retrial interval. The ERPs' latencies and amplitudes were blindly calculated and were analyzed by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures.

RESULTS

Significant decreases of N2 amplitude at Fz, P3 amplitude at Cz and P3 latency at Pz were recorded in the second-compared to the first within session trial (p=0.034, 0.041, 0.046, respectively). There were no significant inter-session differences regarding N1, P2, N2 and P3 latencies or amplitudes. There was no significant interaction between session and trial. A statistically significant difference was found between the first session's mental count errors (p=0.039) but there were no significant differences between the second session's trials (p=0.581) or between sessions (p=0.328).

CONCLUSIONS

N1, P2, N2 and P3 latencies and amplitudes are stable at short-term intervals of one to three days, but one to three minutes' retrial interval may affect P3 latency and N2 and P3 amplitudes. We suggest that when primary novelty-induced cognitive processes are evaluated, single trial sessions or more than three-minute inter-trials interval should be employed in order to mitigate habituation.

摘要

目的

评估在健康成年人中,多次内次试验对 N1、P2、N2 和 P3 潜伏期以及 P2、N2 和 P3 振幅的即时和短期影响。

材料和方法

通过听觉Oddball 范式诱发 ERP,并在 18 名健康成年人的 Fz、Cz 和 Pz 上记录,两次间隔 1 至 3 天,两次内次试验间隔 1 至 3 分钟。ERP 的潜伏期和振幅由重复测量的方差分析 (ANOVA) 进行盲法计算和分析。

结果

与第一次内次试验相比,第二次内次试验时 Fz 的 N2 振幅、Cz 的 P3 振幅和 Pz 的 P3 潜伏期显著降低(p=0.034、0.041、0.046)。在 N1、P2、N2 和 P3 潜伏期或振幅方面,两次试验之间没有显著差异。试验和试验之间没有显著的相互作用。在第一次试验的精神计数错误(p=0.039)中发现了统计学上的显著差异,但在第二次试验的试验(p=0.581)或两次试验之间(p=0.328)没有发现显著差异。

结论

N1、P2、N2 和 P3 的潜伏期和振幅在 1 至 3 天的短期间隔内是稳定的,但 1 至 3 分钟的重试间隔可能会影响 P3 潜伏期以及 N2 和 P3 的振幅。我们建议,当评估主要的新颖性诱导的认知过程时,应该采用单次试验或超过 3 分钟的试验间隔,以减轻习惯化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验