Chan Min-Ho, Chen Wei-Hung, Tung Yi-Wei, Liu Kang, Tan Ping-Heng, Chia Yuan-Yi
Department of Anesthesiology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2012 Jun;50(2):54-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
Postoperative pain is severe after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, femoral nerve block (FNB) is commonly used as an adjuvant to spinal anesthesia for TKA. Some anesthesia providers perform this preoperatively, while others perform it postoperatively. To our knowledge, no study has compared the relative benefits of the timing of performing the procedure. In this study, we investigated whether preoperative FNB would provide better analgesic effects than postoperative FNB in patients undergoing unilateral TKA.
In this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, we divided 82 patients (ASA physical status I-III) undergoing unilateral TKA into four groups: (1) a pre-treatment group, in which FNB was performed with 0.4 mL/kg 0.375% bupivacaine plus 1:200,000 epinephrine after spinal anesthesia but before the operation; (2) a post-treatment group, in which FNB was performed with the same drugs at similar dosages immediately after the operation; (3) a pre-control group, in which FNB was performed with normal saline in the same volume as the tested drugs before the operation; and (4) a post-control group, in which FNB was performed with normal saline in the same volume as the tested drug after the operation. At 2, 4, 6, 24, 48 and 72 postoperative hours, we recorded cumulative morphine consumption, visual analog pain scales (VAS), the time of first request for morphine and its side effects. We also measured knee maximum flexion range of motion once a day for 3 days. Our primary aim was to obtain cumulative morphine consumption in 24 hours.
Within the postoperative 24 hours, we found significant differences in cumulative morphine consumption between patients who received true FNB and those who did not (at 24 hours, treatment groups = 45.6 ± 31.7 and 33.5 ± 20.6 mg vs. controls = 70.8 ± 31.2 and 78.8 ± 37.7 mg, p < 0.001). We also found significant differences in VAS (at 24 hours, p < 0.001) and time to first request of morphine (p = 0.005) between the treatment group and the sham group. However, there were no significant differences in these values between the pre-surgical treatment group and the post-surgical treatment group. Beyond 24 hours, there were no significant differences in morphine consumption or maximum flexion range on day 2 and day 3 among the four groups.
Patients who received FNB used for total knee arthroplasty consumed significantly less postoperative morphine and had significant relief of post-TKA pain on postoperative day 1 than those who did not have FNB. However, at follow-up we found no significant differences in these values between those receiving FNB before surgery and those receiving it after surgery.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)后疼痛剧烈。因此,股神经阻滞(FNB)常用于TKA脊髓麻醉的辅助手段。一些麻醉医生在术前进行此操作,而另一些则在术后进行。据我们所知,尚无研究比较该操作时机的相对益处。在本研究中,我们调查了接受单侧TKA的患者术前FNB是否比术后FNB能提供更好的镇痛效果。
在这项双盲、随机、对照试验中,我们将82例接受单侧TKA的患者(ASA身体状况I-III级)分为四组:(1)预处理组,在脊髓麻醉后但手术前用0.4 mL/kg 0.375%布比卡因加1:200,000肾上腺素进行FNB;(2)后处理组,在手术后立即用相同药物以相似剂量进行FNB;(3)术前对照组,在手术前用与受试药物相同体积的生理盐水进行FNB;(4)术后对照组,在手术后用与受试药物相同体积的生理盐水进行FNB。在术后2、4、6、24、48和72小时,我们记录累积吗啡消耗量、视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)、首次要求使用吗啡的时间及其副作用。我们还连续3天每天测量一次膝关节最大屈曲活动范围。我们的主要目的是获取24小时内的累积吗啡消耗量。
在术后24小时内,我们发现接受真正FNB的患者与未接受FNB的患者在累积吗啡消耗量上存在显著差异(24小时时,治疗组分别为45.6±31.7和33.5±20.6 mg,而对照组分别为70.8±31.2和78.8±37.7 mg,p<0.001)。我们还发现治疗组与假手术组在VAS(24小时时,p<0.001)和首次要求使用吗啡的时间(p = 0.005)上存在显著差异。然而,术前治疗组与术后治疗组在这些值上没有显著差异。术后24小时后,四组在第2天和第3天的吗啡消耗量或最大屈曲范围上没有显著差异。
接受用于全膝关节置换术的FNB的患者术后吗啡消耗量明显低于未接受FNB的患者,且在术后第1天TKA后疼痛得到明显缓解。然而,在随访中我们发现术前接受FNB的患者与术后接受FNB的患者在这些值上没有显著差异。