• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性评估低危型子宫内膜癌淋巴结切除术的生存、发病和成本。

Prospective assessment of survival, morbidity, and cost associated with lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancer.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.035
PMID:22771890
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since 1999, patients with low risk endometrial cancer (EC) as defined by the Mayo criteria have preferably not undergone lymphadenectomy (LND) at our institution. Here we prospectively assess survival, sites of recurrence, morbidity, and cost in this low risk cohort.

METHODS

Cause-specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Complications were graded per the Accordion Classification. Thirty-day cost analyses were expressed in 2010 Medicare dollars.

RESULTS

Among 1393 consecutive surgically managed cases, 385 (27.6%) met inclusion criteria, accounting for 34.1% of type I EC. There were 80 LND and 305 non-LND cases. Complications in the first 30 days were significantly more common in the LND cohort (37.5% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001). The prevalence of lymph node metastasis was 0.3% (1/385). Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years only 5 of 31 deaths were due to disease. The 5-year CSS in LND and non-LND cases was 97.3% and 99.0%, respectively (P=0.32). None of the 11 total recurrences occurred in the pelvic or para-aortic nodal areas. Median 30-day cost of care was $15,678 for LND cases compared to $11,028 for non-LND cases (P<0.001). The estimated cost per up-staged low-risk case was $327,866 to $439,990, adding an additional $1,418,189 if all 305 non-LND cases had undergone LND.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy dramatically increases morbidity and cost of care without discernible benefits in low-risk EC as defined by the Mayo criteria. In these low-risk patients, hysterectomy with salpingo-oophorectomy alone is appropriate surgical management and should be standard of care.

摘要

目的

自 1999 年以来,我们医院的低危子宫内膜癌(EC)患者(根据 Mayo 标准定义)优选不进行淋巴结切除术(LND)。在此,我们前瞻性评估该低危患者队列的生存情况、复发部位、发病率和成本。

方法

使用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计特定原因生存率(CSS),并使用对数秩检验进行比较。并发症按 Accordion 分类分级。30 天的成本分析以 2010 年医疗保险美元表示。

结果

在连续 1393 例手术治疗的病例中,385 例(27.6%)符合纳入标准,占 I 型 EC 的 34.1%。其中有 80 例行 LND,305 例行非 LND。在 LND 组中,术后 30 天的并发症发生率明显更高(37.5%比 19.3%;P<0.001)。淋巴结转移的发生率为 0.3%(1/385)。中位随访 5.4 年后,仅有 31 例死亡中的 5 例归因于疾病。LND 和非 LND 病例的 5 年 CSS 分别为 97.3%和 99.0%(P=0.32)。在所有 11 例总复发病例中,均未发生盆腔或腹主动脉淋巴结区域的复发。LND 病例的中位 30 天医疗费用为 15678 美元,而非 LND 病例为 11028 美元(P<0.001)。如果对所有 305 例非 LND 病例进行 LND,则对每例升期低危病例的估计成本为 327866 美元至 439990 美元,增加 1418189 美元。

结论

根据 Mayo 标准定义的低危 EC,LND 显著增加了发病率和医疗费用,但未带来明显的获益。在这些低危患者中,单纯子宫切除术加输卵管卵巢切除术是合适的手术治疗方法,应作为标准治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Prospective assessment of survival, morbidity, and cost associated with lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancer.前瞻性评估低危型子宫内膜癌淋巴结切除术的生存、发病和成本。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Oct;127(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.035. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
2
The impact of surgical guidelines and periodic quality assessment on the staging of endometrial cancer.手术指南和定期质量评估对子宫内膜癌分期的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Oct;123(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.018. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
3
Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients.系统性淋巴结清扫术与辅助放疗在淋巴结阳性子宫内膜癌患者中的疗效
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 May;101(2):200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.032. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
4
The influence of radiation modality and lymph node dissection on survival in early-stage endometrial cancer.放疗方式和淋巴结清扫术对早期子宫内膜癌患者生存的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):1872-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.054. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
5
Lymph-vascular space invasion and number of positive para-aortic node groups predict survival in node-positive patients with endometrial cancer.淋巴管间隙浸润和主动脉旁阳性淋巴结组数量可预测子宫内膜癌淋巴结阳性患者的生存率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Mar;96(3):651-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.11.026.
6
Is selective lymphadenectomy more cost-effective than routine lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer?在子宫内膜癌患者中,选择性淋巴结切除术比常规淋巴结切除术更具成本效益吗?
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Feb;128(2):166-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
7
[Pelvic lymphadenectomy as an alternative to adjuvant radiotherapy in early stage endometrial cancer at high risk of recurrent lymphatic metastases (stage I)].盆腔淋巴结清扫术作为早期子宫内膜癌(I期)中复发性淋巴转移高风险患者辅助放疗的替代方案
Minerva Ginecol. 2009 Feb;61(1):1-12.
8
Analysis of FIGO Stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)Ⅲc期子宫内膜癌患者分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 May;81(2):273-8. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6157.
9
Risk factors that mitigate the role of paraaortic lymphadenectomy in uterine endometrioid cancer.减轻子宫内胚层样癌腹膜后淋巴结切除术作用的风险因素。
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.05.035. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
10
Surgical staging for endometrial cancer in the elderly - is there a role for lymphadenectomy?老年子宫内膜癌的手术分期——淋巴结切除术是否有作用?
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jul;126(1):12-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy and Interrater Agreement of FDG-PET/CT Lymph Node Staging in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: The SENTIREC-Endo Study.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG-PET/CT)对高危子宫内膜癌淋巴结分期的诊断准确性及评分者间一致性:SENTIREC-Endo研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 19;17(14):2396. doi: 10.3390/cancers17142396.
2
Tailoring Endometrial Cancer Treatment Based on Molecular Pathology: Current Status and Possible Impacts on Systemic and Local Treatment.基于分子病理学的子宫内膜癌治疗定制:现状及对全身和局部治疗的可能影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 15;25(14):7742. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147742.
3
A Review of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy for Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: Extraperitoneal Approach May Have the Advantage over Intraperitoneal Approach.
早期子宫内膜癌腹腔镜主动脉旁淋巴结切除术的综述:腹膜外入路可能比腹膜内入路更具优势。
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Oct 31;13(1):10-18. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_25_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
4
Recent management of endometrial cancer: a narrative review of the literature.子宫内膜癌的近期管理:文献综述
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 3;10:1244634. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1244634. eCollection 2023.
5
Use of clinical variables for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.利用临床变量预测子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jan 7;54(1):38-46. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyad135.
6
Construction and validation of nomograms for predicting the prognosis of elderly patients with uterine serous carcinoma: a SEER-based study.基于 SEER 数据库构建并验证预测老年子宫浆液性癌患者预后的列线图模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):14475-14492. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05174-3. Epub 2023 Aug 12.
7
The role of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in determining tumor aggressiveness during preoperative surgical planning in early-stage endometrial cancer.弥散磁共振成像在预测早期子宫内膜癌术前手术计划中肿瘤侵袭性的作用。
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2023 Nov;63(Suppl 2):41-48. doi: 10.1007/s00117-023-01134-7. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
8
The impact of lymphovascular space invasion on survival in early stage low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer.淋巴血管空间侵犯对早期低级别子宫内膜样型子宫内膜癌生存的影响。
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Mar 13;28(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01084-9.
9
HISTOPATHOLOGIC PARAMETERS OF POSITIVE LYMPH NODE PREDICTABILITY IN ENDOMETRIAL CANCER.子宫内膜癌中阳性淋巴结预测的组织病理学参数。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Aug;61(2):206-213. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.02.06.
10
Development and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Metabolic Risk Score for Assessing Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.基于代谢风险评分的列线图构建及其在子宫内膜癌患者中预测淋巴脉管间隙浸润的验证
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15654. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315654.