Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;96(9):1180-4. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301820. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Three types of open-angle glaucoma (OAG)--primary, pigmentary and pseudoexfoliative--are frequently encountered. The aim of this study was to compare demographic, ocular and systemic medical information collected on people with these three OAG types at diagnosis, and determine if the OAG type affected the prognosis.
Information on 607 participants of the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study was accessed. Descriptive statistics characterised their demographic, ocular and medical status at diagnosis. Comparisons were made using analysis of variance and χ(2) or Fisher's exact tests. Multinomial, mixed and logistic regression analyses were also performed.
Relative to people with primary OAG, those with pigmentary OAG were younger, more likely to be white, less likely to have a family history of glaucoma, and were more myopic. Those with pseudoexfoliative OAG were older, more likely to be white, more likely to be women, less likely to have bilateral disease, and presented with higher intraocular pressure (IOP) and better visual acuity. The type of glaucoma was not associated with IOP or visual field progression during follow-up.
Characteristics of newly diagnosed enrollees differed by the type of OAG. While some of these differences relate to the pathogenesis of OAG type, other differences are noteworthy for further evaluation within population-based samples of subjects with newly diagnosed OAG.
背景/目的:三种开角型青光眼(OAG)——原发性、色素性和剥脱性——经常被发现。本研究旨在比较三种 OAG 类型患者在诊断时收集的人口统计学、眼部和全身医学信息,并确定 OAG 类型是否影响预后。
研究人员查阅了协作性初始青光眼治疗研究(Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study)的 607 名参与者的信息。描述性统计分析了他们在诊断时的人口统计学、眼部和医学状况。使用方差分析和卡方检验或 Fisher 精确检验进行比较。还进行了多项、混合和逻辑回归分析。
与原发性 OAG 患者相比,色素性 OAG 患者更年轻、更可能是白人、更不可能有青光眼家族史、更近视。剥脱性 OAG 患者年龄更大、更可能是白人、更可能是女性、更少双侧疾病,且眼压(IOP)更高,视力更好。在随访期间,青光眼类型与眼压或视野进展无关。
新诊断患者的特征因 OAG 类型而异。虽然这些差异中的一些与 OAG 类型的发病机制有关,但其他差异值得在新诊断 OAG 患者的基于人群的样本中进一步评估。