• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在二选一强制选择任务中估计判别性能:MATLAB 和 R 的例程。

Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 4, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1157-74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0207-z.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-012-0207-z
PMID:22773433
Abstract

Ulrich and Vorberg (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71: 1219-1227, 2009) introduced a novel approach for estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks. This approach avoids pitfalls that are inherent when the order of the standard and the comparison is neglected in estimating the difference limen (DL), as in traditional approaches. The present article provides MATLAB and R routines that implement this novel procedure for estimating DLs. These routines also allow to account for processing failures such as lapses or finger errors and can be applied to experimental designs in which the standard and comparison differ only along the task-relevant dimension, as well as to designs in which the stimuli differ in more than one dimension. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to check the quality of our routines.

摘要

乌尔里希和沃尔伯格(Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71: 1219-1227, 2009)提出了一种新的方法来估计二选一强制选择(2AFC)任务中的辨别性能。这种方法避免了当在估计传统方法中忽略标准和比较的顺序时,在估计差异阈限(DL)时所固有的陷阱。本文提供了 MATLAB 和 R 例程,这些例程实现了这种新的 DL 估计程序。这些例程还允许考虑处理失败,如失误或手指错误,并可应用于标准和比较仅在任务相关维度上有所不同的实验设计,以及刺激在多个维度上有所不同的设计。此外,还进行了蒙特卡罗模拟以检查我们例程的质量。

相似文献

1
Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.在二选一强制选择任务中估计判别性能:MATLAB 和 R 的例程。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1157-74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0207-z.
2
Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).提醒任务和二项迫选任务对差别阈限的估计相似:对拉皮德、乌尔里希和拉姆塞尔(2008年)数据的重新分析以及乌尔里希和沃伯格(2009年)的讨论。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1155-78. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1155.
3
DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.提醒任务和二项迫选任务中的辨别学习:数据与模型
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1179-98. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1179.
4
Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.估计二项迫选任务中的差别阈限:陷阱与改进的估计方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1219-27. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1219.
5
On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.关于估计时长辨别任务中的差别阈限:二项迫选法与提示任务的比较
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):291-305. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.291.
6
Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.二项迫选(2AFC)任务中的阈值估计:斯皮尔曼-卡尔贝方法。
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Apr;66(3):517-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03194898.
7
Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.二项迫选检测任务中的时间间隔偏差:梳理假象
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2332-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0167-x.
8
Improving the estimation of psychometric functions in 2AFC discrimination tasks.改进二项迫选辨别任务中心理测量函数的估计。
Front Psychol. 2011 May 11;2:96. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00096. eCollection 2011.
9
The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.与二项迫选任务相比,提示任务中更高的时间敏锐度与标准持续时间和感觉模态无关。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):26-31. doi: 10.1037/a0025349. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
10
Singularities in the inverse modeling of 2AFC contrast discrimination data.双间隔迫选对比度辨别数据逆向建模中的奇点
Vision Res. 2006 Jan;46(1-2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.022. Epub 2005 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing Human Perception of Speed Differences in Walking: Insights From a Drift Diffusion Model.表征人类对步行速度差异的感知:来自漂移扩散模型的见解
eNeuro. 2025 May 2;12(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0343-23.2025. Print 2025 May.
2
Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.刺激辨别任务中的顺序效应挑战了比较判断的既定模型:B 型效应的元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2275-2284. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02479-3. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
3
On the interplay of visuospatial and audiotemporal dominance: Evidence from a multimodal kappa effect.
关于视觉空间优势与听觉时间优势的相互作用:来自多模态kappa效应的证据。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):535-552. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1437-z.
4
The Indecision Model of Psychophysical Performance in Dual-Presentation Tasks: Parameter Estimation and Comparative Analysis of Response Formats.双呈现任务中心理物理表现的犹豫不决模型:反应格式的参数估计与比较分析
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 12;8:1142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01142. eCollection 2017.