• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估计二项迫选任务中的差别阈限:陷阱与改进的估计方法。

Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.

作者信息

Ulrich Rolf, Vorberg Dirk

机构信息

Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Psychological Institute, University of Tübingen, Friedrichstr. 21, 72072 Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1219-27. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1219.

DOI:10.3758/APP.71.6.1219
PMID:19633337
Abstract

Discrimination performance is often assessed by measuring the difference limen (DL; or just noticeable difference) in a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task. Here, we show that the DL estimated from 2AFC percentage-correct data is likely to systematically under- or overestimate true discrimination performance if order effects are present. We show how pitfalls with the 2AFC task may be avoided and suggest a novel approach for analyzing 2AFC data.

摘要

辨别性能通常通过在二选一强制选择(2AFC)任务中测量差别阈限(DL;或刚好可察觉差异)来评估。在此,我们表明,如果存在顺序效应,从2AFC正确率数据估计出的DL可能会系统性地低估或高估真实的辨别性能。我们展示了如何避免2AFC任务中的陷阱,并提出了一种分析2AFC数据的新方法。

相似文献

1
Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.估计二项迫选任务中的差别阈限:陷阱与改进的估计方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1219-27. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1219.
2
Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: a reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009).提醒任务和二项迫选任务对差别阈限的估计相似:对拉皮德、乌尔里希和拉姆塞尔(2008年)数据的重新分析以及乌尔里希和沃伯格(2009年)的讨论。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1155-78. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1155.
3
DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: data and models.提醒任务和二项迫选任务中的辨别学习:数据与模型
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 May;72(4):1179-98. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.4.1179.
4
Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.二项迫选检测任务中的时间间隔偏差:梳理假象
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Oct;73(7):2332-52. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0167-x.
5
On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.关于估计时长辨别任务中的差别阈限:二项迫选法与提示任务的比较
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):291-305. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.291.
6
Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: routines for MATLAB and R.在二选一强制选择任务中估计判别性能:MATLAB 和 R 的例程。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1157-74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0207-z.
7
Threshold estimation in two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) tasks: the Spearman-Kärber method.二项迫选(2AFC)任务中的阈值估计:斯皮尔曼-卡尔贝方法。
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Apr;66(3):517-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03194898.
8
The greater temporal acuity in the reminder task than in the 2AFC task is independent of standard duration and sensory modality.与二项迫选任务相比,提示任务中更高的时间敏锐度与标准持续时间和感觉模态无关。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Mar;66(1):26-31. doi: 10.1037/a0025349. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
9
Subthreshold noise facilitates the detection and discrimination of visual signals.阈下噪声有助于视觉信号的检测与辨别。
Neurosci Lett. 2008 May 9;436(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.036. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
10
Bayesian adaptive estimation of arbitrary points on a psychometric function.心理测量函数上任意点的贝叶斯自适应估计。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2007 May;60(Pt 1):147-74. doi: 10.1348/000711006X104596.

引用本文的文献

1
Presentation time shapes perceived room size in visual and auditory modalities.呈现时间在视觉和听觉模态中塑造了对房间大小的感知。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Jun 15;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00644-3.
2
Characterizing Human Perception of Speed Differences in Walking: Insights From a Drift Diffusion Model.表征人类对步行速度差异的感知:来自漂移扩散模型的见解
eNeuro. 2025 May 2;12(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0343-23.2025. Print 2025 May.
3
New approaches to the single-interval adjustment matrix yes-no task.单区间调整矩阵是/否任务的新方法。
Front Psychol. 2024 Nov 22;15:1416188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416188. eCollection 2024.
4
Differences between sub-second and supra-second durations for the assessment of timing deficits in amnestic mild cognitive impairment.用于评估遗忘型轻度认知障碍时间缺陷的亚秒级和超秒级持续时间之间的差异。
Aging Brain. 2024 Jun 26;6:100120. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2024.100120. eCollection 2024.
5
Order effects in stimulus discrimination challenge established models of comparative judgement: A meta-analytic review of the Type B effect.刺激辨别任务中的顺序效应挑战了比较判断的既定模型:B 型效应的元分析综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2275-2284. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02479-3. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
6
Subjective and objective measures of visual awareness converge.主客观视觉意识测量结果趋于一致。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292438. eCollection 2023.
7
Influences of temporal order in temporal reproduction.时间顺序对时间再现的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Dec;30(6):2210-2218. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02310-5. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.双侧人工耳蜗刺激下的两耳时间差敏感度在高达 900pps 的高脉冲率下仍然存在。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 7;13(1):3785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30569-0.
9
Duration discrimination: A diffusion decision modeling approach.时长辨别:一种扩散决策建模方法。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):560-577. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02604-1. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
10
Reducing the tendency for chronometric counting in duration discrimination tasks.降低在时长辨别任务中进行计时计数的倾向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Nov;84(8):2641-2654. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02523-1. Epub 2022 Jun 14.