Walsh Kenneth, Kitson Alison, Cross Wendy, Thoms Debra, Thornton Anna, Moss Cheryle, Campbell Steve, Graham Iain
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health, University of Wollongong, Nursing Development and Research Unit, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Australia.
Collegian. 2012;19(2):67-75. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2012.02.001.
Practice development (PD) and knowledge translation (KT) have emerged recently as methodologies which assist advancement in gathering and using evidence in practice. For nursing to benefit from these methodologies there is a need to advance the dialogue between academia and the service sector concerning the use and further development of these methodologies as well as how we create the most effective partnerships between academia and practice. To advance this dialogue and to gain insights into the similarities and differences between KT and PD and between the academic and the service sectors, four conversations from different leaders in these sectors have been gathered and are presented here. These four discrete narratives are presented to showcase the diversity of sector contexts in relation to PD and KT methodologies. Narrative One focuses on some of the theoretical and policy issues related to creating partnerships between traditional "knowledge creation systems" (universities) and "knowledge utilization systems" Narrative Two discusses how a large school of nursing responded to the challenge of creating partnerships for practice development in an attempt to bridge the academic/service divide and produce benefits to both organisations. Narratives Three and Four describe the view of practice development from the service side. The final section of the paper presents an agenda for discussion and action based on the emerging set of principles.
实践发展（PD）和知识转化（KT）最近已成为有助于在实践中收集和使用证据方面取得进展的方法。为了让护理专业从这些方法中受益，有必要推动学术界与服务部门之间就这些方法的使用和进一步发展，以及我们如何在学术界与实践之间建立最有效的伙伴关系展开对话。为了推进这一对话，并深入了解KT与PD之间以及学术部门与服务部门之间的异同，我们收集了来自这些部门不同领导者的四段对话并在此呈现。这四段不同的叙述旨在展示与PD和KT方法相关的部门背景的多样性。叙述一聚焦于与传统“知识创造系统”（大学）和“知识利用系统”建立伙伴关系相关的一些理论和政策问题。叙述二讨论了一所大型护理学院如何应对为实践发展建立伙伴关系的挑战，试图弥合学术/服务鸿沟并为两个组织带来益处。叙述三与叙述四从服务层面描述了实践发展的观点。本文的最后一部分基于新出现的一系列原则提出了一个讨论和行动议程。
