Suppr超能文献

工作记忆容量和斯特鲁普干扰:执行控制的全局与局部指标。

Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: global versus local indices of executive control.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):748-759. doi: 10.1037/a0029200. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

Abstract

Two experiments examined the relations among working memory capacity (WMC), congruency-sequence effects, proportion-congruency effects, and the color-word Stroop effect to test whether congruency-sequence effects might inform theoretical claims regarding WMC's prediction of Stroop interference. In Experiment 1, subjects completed either a high-congruency or low-congruency Stroop task that restricted trial-to-trial repetitions of stimulus dimensions to examine WMC's relation to congruency-sequence effects while minimizing bottom-up, stimulus-driven contributions. Congruency-sequence effects and congruency-proportion effects were significant but did not interact. WMC predicted global Stroop interference under low-congruency conditions but neither local congruency-sequence effects nor global Stroop interference under high-congruency conditions, contrary to previous studies (e.g., Kane & Engle, 2003). A high-congruency Stroop task in Experiment 2 removed the Experiment 1 task constraints, and, here, we obtained the typical, global association between WMC and Stroop interference but still no relation between WMC and congruency-sequence effects. We thus examined the methodological differences between Experiments 1 and 2 to determine whether any of these were locally responsible for the global WMC-related differences. They were not, suggesting that the changes between Experiments 1 and 2 created a general task context that engaged (or disengaged) the executive processes associated with WMC.

摘要

两个实验考察了工作记忆容量(WMC)、一致性-序列效应、比例-一致性效应和颜色-词语斯特鲁普效应之间的关系,以检验一致性-序列效应是否可以为 WMC 预测斯特鲁普干扰的理论主张提供信息。在实验 1 中,被试完成了高一致性或低一致性斯特鲁普任务,该任务限制了刺激维度的试次重复,以检验 WMC 与一致性-序列效应的关系,同时最小化了自下而上的、刺激驱动的贡献。一致性-序列效应和一致性-比例效应是显著的,但没有相互作用。WMC 预测了低一致性条件下的全局斯特鲁普干扰,但在高一致性条件下,既没有预测局部一致性-序列效应,也没有预测全局斯特鲁普干扰,这与之前的研究(例如,Kane & Engle,2003)相反。实验 2 中的高一致性斯特鲁普任务消除了实验 1 中的任务限制,在这里,我们得到了 WMC 和斯特鲁普干扰之间的典型全局关联,但 WMC 和一致性-序列效应之间仍然没有关联。因此,我们检查了实验 1 和实验 2 之间的方法学差异,以确定这些差异是否在局部上导致了全局 WMC 相关差异。事实并非如此,这表明实验 1 和实验 2 之间的变化创建了一个一般的任务环境,该环境参与(或不参与)与 WMC 相关的执行过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验