Kiyonaga Anastasia, Egner Tobias
Duke University
Duke University.
Psychol Sci. 2014 Aug;25(8):1619-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797614536739. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
Working memory (WM) has recently been described as internally directed attention, which implies that WM content should affect behavior exactly like an externally perceived and attended stimulus. We tested whether holding a color word in WM, rather than attending to it in the external environment, can produce interference in a color-discrimination task, which would mimic the classic Stroop effect. Over three experiments, the WM Stroop effect recapitulated core properties of the classic attentional Stroop effect, displaying equivalent congruency effects, additive contributions from stimulus- and response-level congruency, and susceptibility to modulation by the percentage of congruent and incongruent trials. Moreover, WM maintenance was inversely related to attentional demands during the WM delay between stimulus presentation and recall, with poorer memory performance following incongruent than congruent trials. Together, these results suggest that WM and attention rely on the same resources and operate over the same representations.
工作记忆(WM)最近被描述为内部导向的注意力,这意味着工作记忆的内容对行为的影响应该与外部感知并关注的刺激完全相同。我们测试了在工作记忆中保持一个颜色词,而不是在外部环境中关注它,是否会在颜色辨别任务中产生干扰,这将模拟经典的斯特鲁普效应。在三个实验中,工作记忆斯特鲁普效应概括了经典注意力斯特鲁普效应的核心特性,表现出等效的一致性效应、刺激和反应水平一致性的累加作用,以及对一致性和不一致性试验百分比调制的敏感性。此外,在刺激呈现和回忆之间的工作记忆延迟期间,工作记忆维持与注意力需求呈负相关,不一致试验后的记忆表现比一致试验差。总之,这些结果表明工作记忆和注意力依赖于相同的资源,并在相同的表征上运作。