HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Aschheim-Dornach, Munich, Germany.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;75(2):404-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04377.x.
Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B)-inflamed skin.
This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO(2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post-dose from both skin types.
Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B)-inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml(-1) for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings.
TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.
通过比较新型 TRPV1 拮抗剂 ABT-102 与阳性对照药和安慰剂在正常和 UV(B)炎症皮肤中的顶点-EEG 峰间(PtP)振幅的激光(辐射热)诱发的电位(LEP),来确定 ABT-102 的急性抗伤害感受/抗痛觉过敏疗效。
这是一项随机、安慰剂和阳性对照、双盲、个体内交叉试验。24 名健康受试者接受了 6 种单剂量的 ABT-102(0.5、2、6mg)、依托考昔 90mg、曲马多 100mg 和安慰剂。通过 CO2 激光在正常和 UV(B)炎症皮肤上诱导疼痛刺激。在基线和给药后 8 小时内,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS-疼痛)对两种皮肤类型的 LEP 和 VAS 评分进行评估。
与安慰剂相比,在 8 小时内,ABT-102 6mg(P<0.001)、ABT-102 2mg(P=0.002)、曲马多 100mg(P<0.001)和依托考昔 90mg(P=0.001)均能显著降低 UV(B)炎症皮肤的 LEP PtP 振幅的主要变量,而 ABT-102 0.5mg 与安慰剂相似。ABT-102 6mg 在 8 小时内优于阳性对照药(P<0.05),而 ABT-102 2mg 则与阳性对照药相当。与安慰剂相比,ABT-102 6mg(P<0.001)和 ABT-102 2mg(P=0.002)的 VAS 评分均有改善。ABT-102 的平均血浆浓度分别为 0.5、2 和 6mg 剂量时的 1.3、4.4 和 9.4ngml-1。无明显临床安全性发现。
TRPV1 拮抗作用在治疗临床疼痛方面具有广阔的应用前景,但需要进一步研究。