Suppr超能文献

一种口服 TRPV1 拮抗剂可减弱激光辐射热诱发的电位和来自 UV(B) 炎症皮肤和正常皮肤的疼痛评分。

An oral TRPV1 antagonist attenuates laser radiant-heat-evoked potentials and pain ratings from UV(B)-inflamed and normal skin.

机构信息

HPR Dr. Schaffler GmbH, Aschheim-Dornach, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb;75(2):404-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04377.x.

Abstract

AIMS

Laser (radiant-heat) evoked potentials (LEPs) from vertex-EEG peak-to-peak (PtP) amplitude were used to determine acute antinociceptive/antihyperalgesic efficacy of ABT-102, a novel TRPV1 antagonist efficacious in preclinical pain models, compared with active controls and placebo in normal and UV(B)-inflamed skin.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, double-blind, intra-individual, crossover trial. Twenty-four healthy subjects received six sequences of single doses of ABT-102 (0.5, 2, 6 mg), etoricoxib 90 mg, tramadol 100 mg and placebo. Painful stimuli were induced by CO(2) -laser on normal and UV(B) -inflamed skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale (VAS-pain) ratings were taken at baseline and hourly up to 8 h post-dose from both skin types.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, significant mean decreases in the primary variable of LEP PtP-amplitude from UV(B)-inflamed skin were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001), ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002), tramadol 100 mg (P < 0.001), and etoricoxib 90 mg (P = 0.001) over the 8 h period; ABT-102 0.5 mg was similar to placebo. ABT-102 6 mg was superior to active controls over the 8 h period (P < 0.05) whereas ABT-102 2 mg was comparable. Improvements in VAS scores compared with placebo were observed with ABT-102 6 mg (P < 0.001) and ABT-102 2 mg (P = 0.002). ABT-102 average plasma concentrations were 1.3, 4.4 and 9.4 ng ml(-1) for the 0.5, 2 and 6 mg doses, respectively. There were no clinically significant safety findings.

CONCLUSIONS

TRPV-1 antagonism appears promising in the management of clinical pain, but requires further investigation.

摘要

目的

通过比较新型 TRPV1 拮抗剂 ABT-102 与阳性对照药和安慰剂在正常和 UV(B)炎症皮肤中的顶点-EEG 峰间(PtP)振幅的激光(辐射热)诱发的电位(LEP),来确定 ABT-102 的急性抗伤害感受/抗痛觉过敏疗效。

方法

这是一项随机、安慰剂和阳性对照、双盲、个体内交叉试验。24 名健康受试者接受了 6 种单剂量的 ABT-102(0.5、2、6mg)、依托考昔 90mg、曲马多 100mg 和安慰剂。通过 CO2 激光在正常和 UV(B)炎症皮肤上诱导疼痛刺激。在基线和给药后 8 小时内,通过视觉模拟量表(VAS-疼痛)对两种皮肤类型的 LEP 和 VAS 评分进行评估。

结果

与安慰剂相比,在 8 小时内,ABT-102 6mg(P<0.001)、ABT-102 2mg(P=0.002)、曲马多 100mg(P<0.001)和依托考昔 90mg(P=0.001)均能显著降低 UV(B)炎症皮肤的 LEP PtP 振幅的主要变量,而 ABT-102 0.5mg 与安慰剂相似。ABT-102 6mg 在 8 小时内优于阳性对照药(P<0.05),而 ABT-102 2mg 则与阳性对照药相当。与安慰剂相比,ABT-102 6mg(P<0.001)和 ABT-102 2mg(P=0.002)的 VAS 评分均有改善。ABT-102 的平均血浆浓度分别为 0.5、2 和 6mg 剂量时的 1.3、4.4 和 9.4ngml-1。无明显临床安全性发现。

结论

TRPV1 拮抗作用在治疗临床疼痛方面具有广阔的应用前景,但需要进一步研究。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Ultraviolet Radiation on the Skin: A Painful Experience?皮肤受到的紫外线辐射:一种痛苦的体验?
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016 Feb;22(2):118-26. doi: 10.1111/cns.12444. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

2
Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition.《受体和离子通道手册》(GRAC)第 5 版。
Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Nov;164 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01649_1.x.
6
TRPV1: on the road to pain relief.TRPV1:通向止痛之路。
Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2008 Nov;1(3):255-69. doi: 10.2174/1874467210801030255.
10
Predicting therapeutic efficacy - experimental pain in human subjects.预测治疗效果——人类受试者的实验性疼痛
Brain Res Rev. 2009 Apr;60(1):243-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.016. Epub 2008 Dec 31.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验