Schaffler Klaus, Nicolas Laurent B, Borta Andreas, Brand Tobias, Reitmeir Peter, Roebling Robert, Scholpp Joachim
HPR, Human Pharmacodynamic Research GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Translational Medicine and Clinical Pharmacology, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an der Riss, Germany.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;83(7):1424-1435. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13247. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
The aim of the present study was to assess the predictivity of laser-(radiant-heat)-evoked potentials (LEPs) from the vertex electroencephalogram, using an algesimetric procedure, testing the anti-nociceptive/anti-hyperalgesic effects of single oral doses of four marketed analgesics (of different compound classes) vs. placebo, in healthy volunteers with three skin types.
This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, five-way-crossover trial. Twenty-five healthy male/female Caucasians were included (receiving celecoxib 200 mg, pregabalin 150 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, lacosamide 100 mg or placebo) in a Williams design, with CO laser-induced painful stimuli to normal, ultraviolet (UV) B-inflamed and capsaicin-irritated skin. LEPs and visual analogue scale ratings were taken at baseline and hourly for 6 h postdose from all three skin types.
In normal skin, the averaged postdose LEP peak-to-peak-(PtP)-amplitudes were reduced by pregabalin (-2.68 μV; 95% confidence interval (CI) -4.16, 1.19) and duloxetine (-1.73 μV; 95% CI -3.21, -0.26) but not by lacosamide and celecoxib vs. placebo. On UVB-irradiated skin, reflecting inflammatory pain, celecoxib induced a pronounced reduction in LEP PtP amplitudes vs. placebo (-6.2 μV; 95% CI -7.88, -4.51), with a smaller reduction by duloxetine (-4.54 μV; 95% CI -6.21, -2.87) and pregabalin (-3.72 μV; 95% CI -5.40, -2.04), whereas lacosamide was inactive. LEP PtP amplitudes on capsaicin-irritated skin, reflecting peripheral/spinal sensitization, as in neuropathic pain, were reduced by pregabalin (-3.78 μV; 95% CI -5.31, -2.25) and duloxetine (-2.32 μV; 95% CI -3.82, -0.82) but not by celecoxib or lacosamide vs. placebo, which was in agreement with known clinical profiles. Overall, PtP amplitude reductions were in agreement with subjective ratings.
LEP algesimetry is sensitive to analgesics with different modes of action and may enable the effects of novel analgesics to be assessed during early clinical development.
本研究旨在通过痛觉测定程序,评估来自头顶脑电图的激光(辐射热)诱发电位(LEP)的预测性,测试单剂量口服四种市售镇痛药(不同化合物类别)与安慰剂相比,对三种皮肤类型的健康志愿者的抗伤害性/抗痛觉过敏作用。
这是一项随机、安慰剂对照、单盲、五交叉试验。纳入25名健康男性/女性白种人(接受塞来昔布200mg、普瑞巴林150mg、度洛西汀60mg、拉科酰胺100mg或安慰剂),采用威廉姆斯设计,用CO激光对正常皮肤、紫外线(UV)B照射致炎皮肤和辣椒素刺激皮肤施加疼痛刺激。在基线时以及给药后6小时内每小时对所有三种皮肤类型进行LEP和视觉模拟量表评分。
在正常皮肤中,与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林(-2.68μV;95%置信区间(CI)-4.16,-1.19)和度洛西汀(-1.73μV;95%CI-3.21,-0.26)使给药后平均LEP峰峰值(PtP)振幅降低,但拉科酰胺和塞来昔布未使其降低。在UVB照射的皮肤上,反映炎症性疼痛,与安慰剂相比,塞来昔布使LEP PtP振幅显著降低(-6.2μV;95%CI-7.88,-4.51),度洛西汀(-4.54μV;95%CI-6.21,-2.87)和普瑞巴林(-3.72μV;95%CI-5.40,-2.04)降低幅度较小,而拉科酰胺无活性。在辣椒素刺激的皮肤上,反映外周/脊髓敏化,如在神经性疼痛中,与安慰剂相比,普瑞巴林(-3.78μV;95%CI-5.31,-2.25)和度洛西汀(-2.32μV;95%CI-3.82,-0.82)使LEP PtP振幅降低,但塞来昔布和拉科酰胺未使其降低,这与已知的临床特征一致。总体而言,PtP振幅降低与主观评分一致。
LEP痛觉测定法对具有不同作用模式的镇痛药敏感,可能有助于在临床早期开发期间评估新型镇痛药的效果。